Published decisions
26,268
2023 decision volume in the public corpus
Year analysis
Detailed public analysis of the 2023 published Financial Ombudsman decision set, including complaint volume, outcome mix, product concentration, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Page summary
26,268 published FOS decisions in 2023, including upheld-rate context, top firms, top products, recurring complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
26,268
2023 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
41.5%
10,896 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 31 Dec 2023
Published decisions
26,268
2023 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
41.5%
10,896 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and Payments
33.1% of annual decisions
Leading firm
Barclays Bank UK PLC
1,296 published decisions
26,268 published ombudsman decisions landed in 2023. 41.5% of those decisions were upheld, while 58.5% were not upheld. That makes 2023 a meaningful benchmark year for understanding where complaint pressure and adjudication risk sat across the corpus.
Banking and Payments was the heaviest product area, accounting for 8,694 decisions. Barclays Bank UK PLC appeared most often at firm level. The most frequently tagged complaint theme was fraud or scam concern.
The year was led by Banking and Payments, Insurance, Consumer Credit, and others, which together represented the centre of complaint activity in the published decisions for 2023.
Banking and Payments alone contributed 33.1% of all decisions published in 2023, which makes it the clearest lens for understanding how complaint pressure expressed itself that year.
Barclays Bank UK PLC, HSBC UK Bank Plc, Santander UK Plc, and others were the most visible firms in the published decisions for 2023. That does not prove complaint prevalence in a consumer-market sense, but it does show which firms were most exposed in the final ombudsman decisions dataset.
Complaint-theme tagging pointed most strongly to fraud or scam concern, delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, and others. These themes are the most useful public proxy for “complaint type” in this corpus because the raw decisions are not stored with a dedicated complaint-type field.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
DRN-4050748 The complaint Mr H and Mrs W (‘the complainants’) say Fairstone Financial Management Limited (‘FFML’), who serviced their joint General Investment Account (‘GIA’) and their Individual Savings Accounts (‘ISAs’), did as follows: Failed to ensure funds were transferred from their... (15 pages)
View source decisionDRN-4107709 The complaint B complains (on behalf of his limited company) that Revolut Ltd won’t refund transactions he claims were unauthorised. B has the assistance of a representative but for ease of reading, I’ll treat all submissions as having come from B alone. What happened B visited... (5 pages)
View source decisionDRN-4150339 The complaint Mr O complains that Nationwide Building Society (“Nationwide”) won’t refund over £27,000 he lost to a cryptocurrency investment scam. What happened The details of this complaint are well known to both parties, so I won’t repeat everything again here. In brief summ... (4 pages)
View source decisionDRN-4252150 The complaint Mr J complains about QIC Europe Ltd’s (“QIC”) decision not to consider his claim further under his home insurance policy. He also complains about their delay when initially handling the claim and about them not preventing his laptop from being disposed of by their... (5 pages)
View source decisionDRN-4298482 The complaint Mr H complains Barclays Bank UK PLC (Barclays) delayed the transfer of his ISA from another provider without providing any explanation or updates. What happened Mr H says he applied for an Individual Savings Account (ISA) with Barclays in mid-February 2023 and req... (2 pages)
View source decision