Published decisions
51,008
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Product analysis
A public view of how Insurance performs in the published Financial Ombudsman decisions dataset, including volume, outcome mix, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Published decisions
51,008
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
35.8%
18,249 upheld decisions
Page summary
51,008 published FOS decisions in Insurance, with upheld-rate context, firm exposure, complaint themes, advisory patterns, and representative cases.
Published decisions
51,008
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
35.8%
18,249 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 15 Sept 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
51,008
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
35.8%
18,249 upheld decisions
Leading firm
U K Insurance Limited
2,914 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
2,527 tagged decisions
51,008 published decisions in this corpus sit within Insurance. 35.8% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a useful public category page for spotting where complaint outcomes have tended to land.
U K Insurance Limited is the single biggest firm exposure inside Insurance in the published decision set. Delay In Claim Handling is the leading complaint theme in the same category.
Insurance has a multi-year decision trail in the corpus, which makes it possible to compare recent complaint pressure against earlier years rather than relying on a single snapshot.
In 2026, Insurance recorded 1,885 published decisions with an upheld rate of 30.7%.
delay in claim handling, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, policy wording ambiguity, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in Insurance. For public analysis, those tags are the closest durable “type” layer available in the dataset.
The existing advisor model also points to recurring handling implications for Insurance, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 1.3% of cases), review section 140a cca precedent (appears in 1.1% of cases), and others.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr H to accept or reject my decision before 13 October 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons outlined above, my final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 13 October 2026.
View source decisionIt’s my final decision that the offer of £100 made by Intact Insurance UK Limited is fair compensation for the distress and inconvenience caused to Mr and Mrs G. If it has not already, I require that it pay that sum to Mr and Mrs G.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve given, it’s my final decision that I do not uphold this complaint and I make no award against Western Provident Association Limited. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr K to accept or reject my decision before 13 October 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. I don’t require Automobile Association Insurance Services Limited to do anymore.
View source decision