Complaint theme analysis

Administrative Error complaint theme analysis

A public analysis page for the complaint theme administrative error, built from the root-cause tagging layer across published Financial Ombudsman decisions.

Tagged decisions

803

Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag

Upheld rate

35.7%

287 upheld decisions

Page summary

803 published decisions tagged administrative error, with upheld-rate context, product concentration, firm exposure, precedent signals, and representative cases.

Tagged decisions

803

Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag

Upheld rate

35.7%

287 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 24 Mar 2026

How to use this page

Read the metrics first, then the ranked view.

The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.

Tagged decisions

803

Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag

Upheld rate

35.7%

287 upheld decisions

Leading product

Banking and credit

342 decisions

Leading firm

Bank of Scotland Plc

42 decisions

Administrative Error as a public complaint theme

Analysis

803 published decisions in the corpus carry the complaint-theme tag administrative error. 35.7% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this one of the most useful public “type” slices available in the dataset.

Banking and credit is the product line most often associated with this theme, while Bank of Scotland Plc is the firm that appears most often alongside it in published decisions.

  • Latest year represented: 2026
  • Leading precedent signal: Consumer Credit Act 1974
  • Leading firm: Bank of Scotland Plc

How this theme moves across the corpus

Analysis

Administrative Error has enough history in the published decisions to show how complaint pressure has evolved across multiple years, rather than appearing as a one-off issue cluster.

In 2026, administrative error appeared in 46 published decisions with an upheld rate of 39.1%.

  • 2026: 46 decisions, 39.1% upheld
  • 2025: 8 decisions, 50.0% upheld
  • 2024: 15 decisions, 73.3% upheld
  • 2023: 11 decisions, 72.7% upheld
  • 2022: 11 decisions, 36.4% upheld

Where the theme concentrates

Analysis

Banking and credit, Insurance (excluding PPI), Investment and pensions, and others are the product areas most associated with this theme in published decisions. That helps explain where this complaint type is most likely to appear in the ombudsman corpus.

Consumer Credit Act 1974, Disp, Fsma, and others are the most visible precedent signals tied to this complaint theme.

  • Banking and credit: 342 decisions
  • Bank of Scotland Plc: 42 decisions
  • Second precedent signal: Disp

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-584620224 Mar 2026Not upheld

TSB Bank plc · Banking and Payments

My final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr B to accept or reject my decision before 21 April 2026.

View source decision
DRN-601739724 Mar 2026Upheld

U K Insurance Limited · Insurance

My final decision is that I uphold this complaint. U K Insurance Limited should: • pay Mr P a total of £350 compensation; • provide a quote for permanent cover for the vehicle previously insured on a temporary basis and refund any cancellation fees associated with cancelling a 12-month policy to allow him to accept UKI’s quote.

View source decision
DRN-624258424 Mar 2026Not upheld

MONY Group Financial Limited · Insurance

My final decision is that I don’t uphold Mr P’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr P to accept or reject my decision before 21 April 2026.

View source decision
DRN-624604324 Mar 2026Upheld

HSBC UK Bank Plc · Banking and Payments

HSBC UK Bank Plc needs to take the additional step I’ve set out above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr Z to accept or reject my decision before 21 April 2026.

View source decision
DRN-624789724 Mar 2026Upheld

Bank of Scotland Plc · Banking and Payments

My final decision is that I uphold this complaint, in part, against Bank of Scotland plc trading as Halifax. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 21 April 2026.

View source decision