Published decisions
2,391
2026 decision volume in the public corpus
Year analysis
Detailed public analysis of the 2026 published Financial Ombudsman decision set, including complaint volume, outcome mix, product concentration, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Published decisions
2,391
2026 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
23.8%
568 upheld decisions
Page summary
2,391 published FOS decisions in 2026, including upheld-rate context, top firms, top products, recurring complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
2,391
2026 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
23.8%
568 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 17 Mar 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
2,391
2026 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
23.8%
568 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and Payments
40.8% of annual decisions
Leading firm
Shawbrook Bank Limited
137 published decisions
2,391 published ombudsman decisions landed in 2026. 23.8% of those decisions were upheld, while 76.2% were not upheld. That makes 2026 a meaningful benchmark year for understanding where complaint pressure and adjudication risk sat across the corpus.
Banking and Payments was the heaviest product area, accounting for 975 decisions. Shawbrook Bank Limited appeared most often at firm level. The most frequently tagged complaint theme was delay in claim handling.
The year was led by Banking and Payments, Consumer Credit, Insurance, and others, which together represented the centre of complaint activity in the published decisions for 2026.
Banking and Payments alone contributed 40.8% of all decisions published in 2026, which makes it the clearest lens for understanding how complaint pressure expressed itself that year.
Shawbrook Bank Limited, Barclays Bank UK PLC, HSBC UK Bank Plc, and others were the most visible firms in the published decisions for 2026. That does not prove complaint prevalence in a consumer-market sense, but it does show which firms were most exposed in the final ombudsman decisions dataset.
Complaint-theme tagging pointed most strongly to delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, fraud or scam concern, and others. These themes are the most useful public proxy for “complaint type” in this corpus because the raw decisions are not stored with a dedicated complaint-type field.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
For the reasons I’ve explained, I think a reasonable resolution to this complaint has already been proposed and agreed by the business. To resolve matters, Astute Private Wealth Limited should pay Miss S £200 for the trouble and upset caused, if it has not already done so.
View source decisionFor the above reasons, I’m not asking Westerby Trustee Services Limited to do anything. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr L to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionI don’t uphold Mrs P’s complaint about Zurich Assurance Ltd. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs P to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionI’ve decided not to uphold Miss B’s complaint about Monzo Bank Ltd. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss B to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionI don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decision