Published decisions
391
2026 decision volume in the public corpus
Year analysis
Detailed public analysis of the 2026 published Financial Ombudsman decision set, including complaint volume, outcome mix, product concentration, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Page summary
391 published FOS decisions in 2026, including upheld-rate context, top firms, top products, recurring complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
391
2026 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
20.7%
81 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 02 Feb 2026
Published decisions
391
2026 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
20.7%
81 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and Payments
42.5% of annual decisions
Leading firm
Barclays Bank UK PLC
23 published decisions
391 published ombudsman decisions landed in 2026. 20.7% of those decisions were upheld, while 79.3% were not upheld. That makes 2026 a meaningful benchmark year for understanding where complaint pressure and adjudication risk sat across the corpus.
Banking and Payments was the heaviest product area, accounting for 166 decisions. Barclays Bank UK PLC appeared most often at firm level. The most frequently tagged complaint theme was delay in claim handling.
The year was led by Banking and Payments, Consumer Credit, Insurance, and others, which together represented the centre of complaint activity in the published decisions for 2026.
Banking and Payments alone contributed 42.5% of all decisions published in 2026, which makes it the clearest lens for understanding how complaint pressure expressed itself that year.
Barclays Bank UK PLC, HSBC UK Bank Plc, Shawbrook Bank Limited, and others were the most visible firms in the published decisions for 2026. That does not prove complaint prevalence in a consumer-market sense, but it does show which firms were most exposed in the final ombudsman decisions dataset.
Complaint-theme tagging pointed most strongly to delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, fraud or scam concern, and others. These themes are the most useful public proxy for “complaint type” in this corpus because the raw decisions are not stored with a dedicated complaint-type field.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr I to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons outlined above, I’m not upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve explained, I’m not upholding Mr M’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I don’t uphold the estate of Mr W’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask the estate of Mr W to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decision