Year analysis

2026 complaint and ombudsman analysis

Detailed public analysis of the 2026 published Financial Ombudsman decision set, including complaint volume, outcome mix, product concentration, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.

Page summary

391 published FOS decisions in 2026, including upheld-rate context, top firms, top products, recurring complaint themes, and representative cases.

Published decisions

391

2026 decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

20.7%

81 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 02 Feb 2026

Published decisions

391

2026 decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

20.7%

81 upheld decisions

Leading product

Banking and Payments

42.5% of annual decisions

Leading firm

Barclays Bank UK PLC

23 published decisions

What stood out in 2026

391 published ombudsman decisions landed in 2026. 20.7% of those decisions were upheld, while 79.3% were not upheld. That makes 2026 a meaningful benchmark year for understanding where complaint pressure and adjudication risk sat across the corpus.

Banking and Payments was the heaviest product area, accounting for 166 decisions. Barclays Bank UK PLC appeared most often at firm level. The most frequently tagged complaint theme was delay in claim handling.

  • Banking and Payments: 166 decisions
  • Barclays Bank UK PLC: 23 decisions
  • Delay In Claim Handling: 135 tagged decisions
  • 2026 versus 2025: down 98.8% year on year

Product mix and concentration

The year was led by Banking and Payments, Consumer Credit, Insurance, and others, which together represented the centre of complaint activity in the published decisions for 2026.

Banking and Payments alone contributed 42.5% of all decisions published in 2026, which makes it the clearest lens for understanding how complaint pressure expressed itself that year.

  • Banking and Payments: 166 decisions, 15.7% upheld
  • Consumer Credit: 102 decisions, 11.8% upheld
  • Insurance: 95 decisions, 28.4% upheld
  • Pensions and Annuities: 13 decisions, 76.9% upheld
  • Mortgages: 8 decisions, 50.0% upheld

Firm and complaint-theme signals

Barclays Bank UK PLC, HSBC UK Bank Plc, Shawbrook Bank Limited, and others were the most visible firms in the published decisions for 2026. That does not prove complaint prevalence in a consumer-market sense, but it does show which firms were most exposed in the final ombudsman decisions dataset.

Complaint-theme tagging pointed most strongly to delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, fraud or scam concern, and others. These themes are the most useful public proxy for “complaint type” in this corpus because the raw decisions are not stored with a dedicated complaint-type field.

  • Most frequent precedent signal: Consumer Credit Act 1974
  • Second precedent signal: Section 140a Cca
  • Primary complaint theme: Delay In Claim Handling

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-509089902 Feb 2026Not upheld

NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY · Banking and Payments

My final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision
DRN-557014102 Feb 2026Not upheld

Tide Platform Limited · Banking and Payments

My final decision is I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr I to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision
DRN-564159802 Feb 2026Not upheld

Clydesdale Financial Services Limited · Consumer Credit

For the reasons outlined above, I’m not upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision
DRN-574897802 Feb 2026Not upheld

NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY · Banking and Payments

For the reasons I’ve explained, I’m not upholding Mr M’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision
DRN-574988902 Feb 2026Not upheld

AJ Bell Securities Limited · Investments

My final decision is that I don’t uphold the estate of Mr W’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask the estate of Mr W to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision