Firm analysis

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc complaint analysis

A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.

Published decisions

835

Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

20.2%

169 upheld decisions

Page summary

835 published decisions involving Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.

Published decisions

835

Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

20.2%

169 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 21 Apr 2026

How to use this page

Read the metrics first, then the ranked view.

The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.

Published decisions

835

Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

20.2%

169 upheld decisions

Leading product

Consumer Credit

834 decisions

Leading complaint theme

Non-disclosure Or Misrepresentation

152 tagged decisions

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc at a glance

Analysis

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc appears in 835 published decisions in this corpus. 20.2% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.

Consumer Credit is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 834 decisions and an upheld rate of 20.3%.

  • Latest active year in the published data: 2026 (112 decisions)
  • Most common complaint theme: Non-disclosure Or Misrepresentation
  • Most common precedent signal: Consumer Credit Act 1974

Volume and outcome trajectory

Analysis

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc's decision trail runs from 2022 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.

In the latest year represented here, Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc appeared in 112 published decisions with an upheld rate of 4.5%.

  • 2026: 112 decisions, 4.5% upheld
  • 2025: 312 decisions, 14.4% upheld
  • 2024: 205 decisions, 33.2% upheld
  • 2023: 129 decisions, 20.9% upheld
  • 2022: 77 decisions, 31.2% upheld

Themes, products, and precedent signals

Analysis

Non-disclosure Or Misrepresentation is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.

Consumer Credit Act 1974, Section 75 Cca, Section 140a Cca, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.

  • Consumer Credit: 834 decisions
  • Second complaint theme: Affordability Assessment Failure
  • Second precedent signal: Section 75 Cca

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-476287721 Apr 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

My decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-629857121 Apr 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

I am not upholding Mr H’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr H to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-627869620 Apr 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

My final decision is I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Ms M to accept or reject my decision before 18 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-630145820 Apr 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

For the reasons I’ve explained, I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask the estate of Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 18 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-629833717 Apr 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

For the reasons set out above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr H to accept or reject my decision before 15 May 2026.

View source decision