Firm analysis

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc complaint analysis

A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.

Page summary

733 published decisions involving Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.

Published decisions

733

Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

22.4%

164 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 02 Feb 2026

Published decisions

733

Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

22.4%

164 upheld decisions

Leading product

Consumer Credit

732 decisions

Leading complaint theme

Affordability Assessment Failure

68 tagged decisions

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc at a glance

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc appears in 733 published decisions in this corpus. 22.4% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.

Consumer Credit is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 732 decisions and an upheld rate of 22.4%.

  • Latest active year in the published data: 2026 (10 decisions)
  • Most common complaint theme: Affordability Assessment Failure
  • Most common precedent signal: Consumer Credit Act 1974

Volume and outcome trajectory

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc's decision trail runs from 2022 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.

In the latest year represented here, Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc appeared in 10 published decisions with an upheld rate of 0.0%.

  • 2026: 10 decisions, 0.0% upheld
  • 2025: 312 decisions, 14.4% upheld
  • 2024: 205 decisions, 33.2% upheld
  • 2023: 129 decisions, 20.9% upheld
  • 2022: 77 decisions, 31.2% upheld

Themes, products, and precedent signals

Affordability Assessment Failure is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.

Consumer Credit Act 1974, Section 75 Cca, Section 140a Cca, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.

  • Consumer Credit: 732 decisions
  • Second complaint theme: Non-disclosure Or Misrepresentation
  • Second precedent signal: Section 75 Cca

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-580407402 Feb 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

For the reasons set out above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs I to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision
DRN-612144702 Feb 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

For the reasons set out above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Ms W to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision
DRN-600351430 Jan 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

For the reasons set out above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask the estate of Mr A to accept or reject my decision before 27 February 2026.

View source decision
DRN-602652930 Jan 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

For the reasons set out above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr C to accept or reject my decision before 27 February 2026.

View source decision
DRN-608722430 Jan 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

For the reasons I have explained, I do not uphold Mr L’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr L to accept or reject my decision before 27 February 2026.

View source decision