Complaint theme analysis

Affordability Assessment Failure complaint theme analysis

A public analysis page for the complaint theme affordability assessment failure, built from the root-cause tagging layer across published Financial Ombudsman decisions.

Tagged decisions

23,785

Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag

Upheld rate

29.0%

6,891 upheld decisions

Page summary

23,785 published decisions tagged affordability assessment failure, with upheld-rate context, product concentration, firm exposure, precedent signals, and representative cases.

Tagged decisions

23,785

Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag

Upheld rate

29.0%

6,891 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 21 Apr 2026

How to use this page

Read the metrics first, then the ranked view.

The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.

Tagged decisions

23,785

Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag

Upheld rate

29.0%

6,891 upheld decisions

Leading product

Payment protection insurance (PPI)

8,729 decisions

Leading firm

Bank of Scotland Plc

2,757 decisions

Affordability Assessment Failure as a public complaint theme

Analysis

23,785 published decisions in the corpus carry the complaint-theme tag affordability assessment failure. 29.0% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this one of the most useful public “type” slices available in the dataset.

Payment protection insurance (PPI) is the product line most often associated with this theme, while Bank of Scotland Plc is the firm that appears most often alongside it in published decisions.

  • Latest year represented: 2026
  • Leading precedent signal: Consumer Credit Act 1974
  • Leading firm: Bank of Scotland Plc

How this theme moves across the corpus

Analysis

Affordability Assessment Failure has enough history in the published decisions to show how complaint pressure has evolved across multiple years, rather than appearing as a one-off issue cluster.

In 2026, affordability assessment failure appeared in 909 published decisions with an upheld rate of 12.0%.

  • 2026: 909 decisions, 12.0% upheld
  • 2025: 1,145 decisions, 18.0% upheld
  • 2024: 999 decisions, 26.6% upheld
  • 2023: 839 decisions, 39.3% upheld
  • 2022: 903 decisions, 60.2% upheld

Where the theme concentrates

Analysis

Payment protection insurance (PPI), Banking and credit, Consumer Credit, and others are the product areas most associated with this theme in published decisions. That helps explain where this complaint type is most likely to appear in the ombudsman corpus.

Consumer Credit Act 1974, Section 140a Cca, Conc, and others are the most visible precedent signals tied to this complaint theme.

  • Payment protection insurance (PPI): 8,729 decisions
  • Bank of Scotland Plc: 2,757 decisions
  • Second precedent signal: Section 140a Cca

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-476287721 Apr 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

My decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-480026321 Apr 2026Not upheld

Shawbrook Bank Limited · Consumer Credit

I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs C and Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-605033721 Apr 2026Not upheld

MONZO BANK LIMITED · Banking and Payments

For the reasons I’ve outlined above, I’m not upholding Mr D’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr D to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-610818721 Apr 2026Not upheld

First Holiday Finance Ltd · Consumer Credit

My final decision is to not uphold Mr and Mrs D’s complaint about First Holiday Finance Ltd for the reasons provided. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr and Mrs D to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-614184421 Apr 2026Not upheld

Lendable Ltd · Consumer Credit

For the reasons I’ve outlined above, I do not uphold Mr F’s complaint about Lendable Ltd. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr F to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision