Complaint theme analysis

Affordability Assessment Failure complaint theme analysis

A public analysis page for the complaint theme affordability assessment failure, built from the root-cause tagging layer across published Financial Ombudsman decisions.

Page summary

22,973 published decisions tagged affordability assessment failure, with upheld-rate context, product concentration, firm exposure, precedent signals, and representative cases.

Tagged decisions

22,973

Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag

Upheld rate

29.6%

6,793 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 02 Feb 2026

Tagged decisions

22,973

Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag

Upheld rate

29.6%

6,793 upheld decisions

Leading product

Payment protection insurance (PPI)

8,729 decisions

Leading firm

Bank of Scotland Plc

2,743 decisions

Affordability Assessment Failure as a public complaint theme

22,973 published decisions in the corpus carry the complaint-theme tag affordability assessment failure. 29.6% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this one of the most useful public “type” slices available in the dataset.

Payment protection insurance (PPI) is the product line most often associated with this theme, while Bank of Scotland Plc is the firm that appears most often alongside it in published decisions.

  • Latest year represented: 2026
  • Leading precedent signal: Consumer Credit Act 1974
  • Leading firm: Bank of Scotland Plc

How this theme moves across the corpus

Affordability Assessment Failure has enough history in the published decisions to show how complaint pressure has evolved across multiple years, rather than appearing as a one-off issue cluster.

In 2026, affordability assessment failure appeared in 97 published decisions with an upheld rate of 11.3%.

  • 2026: 97 decisions, 11.3% upheld
  • 2025: 1,145 decisions, 18.0% upheld
  • 2024: 999 decisions, 26.6% upheld
  • 2023: 839 decisions, 39.3% upheld
  • 2022: 903 decisions, 60.2% upheld

Where the theme concentrates

Payment protection insurance (PPI), Banking and credit, Consumer Credit, and others are the product areas most associated with this theme in published decisions. That helps explain where this complaint type is most likely to appear in the ombudsman corpus.

Consumer Credit Act 1974, Conc, Section 140a Cca, and others are the most visible precedent signals tied to this complaint theme.

  • Payment protection insurance (PPI): 8,729 decisions
  • Bank of Scotland Plc: 2,743 decisions
  • Second precedent signal: Conc

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-564159802 Feb 2026Not upheld

Clydesdale Financial Services Limited · Consumer Credit

For the reasons outlined above, I’m not upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision
DRN-580302302 Feb 2026Not upheld

Oakbrook Finance Limited · Consumer Credit

It’s my final decision that I don’t uphold this complaint against Oakbrook Finance Limited, for the reasons explained above Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr J to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026. David Barker Ombudsman

View source decision
DRN-580407402 Feb 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

For the reasons set out above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs I to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision
DRN-582792902 Feb 2026Not upheld

Bamboo Limited · Consumer Credit

As outlined above, it’s my final decision that I don’t uphold this complaint against Bamboo Limited. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss C to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision
DRN-583353302 Feb 2026Not upheld

Frasers Group Financial Services Limited · Consumer Credit

For the reasons I’ve explained, I’m not upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs A to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.

View source decision