Published decisions
27,153
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Bank of Scotland Plc, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
27,153
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
13.3%
3,625 upheld decisions
Page summary
27,153 published decisions involving Bank of Scotland Plc, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
27,153
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
13.3%
3,625 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 21 Apr 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
27,153
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
13.3%
3,625 upheld decisions
Leading product
Payment protection insurance (PPI)
14,267 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Affordability Assessment Failure
2,757 tagged decisions
Bank of Scotland Plc appears in 27,153 published decisions in this corpus. 13.3% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Payment protection insurance (PPI) is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 14,267 decisions and an upheld rate of 11.3%.
Bank of Scotland Plc's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, Bank of Scotland Plc appeared in 110 published decisions with an upheld rate of 26.4%.
Affordability Assessment Failure is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Bank of Scotland Plc in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Consumer Credit Act 1974, Disp, Icobs, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint or make any order or award against Bank of Scotland plc trading as Birmingham Midshires Mortgages. My final decision concludes this service’s consideration of this complaint, which means I’ll not be engaging in any further discussion of the merits of it.
View source decisionI direct Bank of Scotland plc (trading as Halifax) to pay £1,434. 00 compensation to Mrs P in accordance with my direction above.
View source decisionMy final decision is I uphold Mr M’s complaint and direct Bank of Scotland plc to put things right in the way I’ve set out above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that Bank of Scotland plc trading as Halifax must amend Mr and Mrs O’s credit files to show them in an arrangement to pay for this mortgage from December 2024 to February 2025 inclusive and it must also pay Mr and Mrs O £75 in compensation, if it has not done so already. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr O and Mrs O to accept or reject my decision befo...
View source decisionFor the reasons I have given, my final decision is I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr W to accept or reject my decision before 18 May 2026.
View source decision