Tagged decisions
21,991
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Complaint theme analysis
A public analysis page for the complaint theme fraud or scam concern, built from the root-cause tagging layer across published Financial Ombudsman decisions.
Tagged decisions
21,991
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
28.5%
6,272 upheld decisions
Page summary
21,991 published decisions tagged fraud or scam concern, with upheld-rate context, product concentration, firm exposure, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Tagged decisions
21,991
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
28.5%
6,272 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 17 Mar 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Tagged decisions
21,991
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
28.5%
6,272 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and Payments
14,575 decisions
Leading firm
Revolut Ltd
2,544 decisions
21,991 published decisions in the corpus carry the complaint-theme tag fraud or scam concern. 28.5% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this one of the most useful public “type” slices available in the dataset.
Banking and Payments is the product line most often associated with this theme, while Revolut Ltd is the firm that appears most often alongside it in published decisions.
Fraud Or Scam Concern has enough history in the published decisions to show how complaint pressure has evolved across multiple years, rather than appearing as a one-off issue cluster.
In 2026, fraud or scam concern appeared in 559 published decisions with an upheld rate of 21.3%.
Banking and Payments, Banking and credit, Insurance (excluding PPI), and others are the product areas most associated with this theme in published decisions. That helps explain where this complaint type is most likely to appear in the ombudsman corpus.
Disp, Consumer Credit Act 1974, Fca Principles, and others are the most visible precedent signals tied to this complaint theme.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
For the above reasons, I’m not asking Westerby Trustee Services Limited to do anything. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr L to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionI’ve decided not to uphold Miss B’s complaint about Monzo Bank Ltd. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss B to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons explained above, I do not uphold this decision. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Ms H to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionI uphold the Estate of Mr M’s complaint and direct Caspian Assured Ltd trading as Caspian Insurance Services to award redress as set out above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask the estate of Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr E to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decision