Tagged decisions
22,385
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Complaint theme analysis
A public analysis page for the complaint theme fraud or scam concern, built from the root-cause tagging layer across published Financial Ombudsman decisions.
Tagged decisions
22,385
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
28.3%
6,327 upheld decisions
Page summary
22,385 published decisions tagged fraud or scam concern, with upheld-rate context, product concentration, firm exposure, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Tagged decisions
22,385
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
28.3%
6,327 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 21 Apr 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Tagged decisions
22,385
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
28.3%
6,327 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and Payments
14,922 decisions
Leading firm
Revolut Ltd
2,592 decisions
22,385 published decisions in the corpus carry the complaint-theme tag fraud or scam concern. 28.3% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this one of the most useful public “type” slices available in the dataset.
Banking and Payments is the product line most often associated with this theme, while Revolut Ltd is the firm that appears most often alongside it in published decisions.
Fraud Or Scam Concern has enough history in the published decisions to show how complaint pressure has evolved across multiple years, rather than appearing as a one-off issue cluster.
In 2026, fraud or scam concern appeared in 953 published decisions with an upheld rate of 18.3%.
Banking and Payments, Banking and credit, Insurance (excluding PPI), and others are the product areas most associated with this theme in published decisions. That helps explain where this complaint type is most likely to appear in the ombudsman corpus.
Payment Services Regulations, Disp, Consumer Credit Act 1974, and others are the most visible precedent signals tied to this complaint theme.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons given above, it’s my final decision not to uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss A to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve explained, I don’t uphold this complaint. This final decision marks the end of our service’s consideration of the case.
View source decisionI don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr L and Mrs L to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decision