Product analysis

Consumer Credit complaint analysis

A public view of how Consumer Credit performs in the published Financial Ombudsman decisions dataset, including volume, outcome mix, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.

Published decisions

30,290

Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

41.6%

12,591 upheld decisions

Page summary

30,290 published FOS decisions in Consumer Credit, with upheld-rate context, firm exposure, complaint themes, advisory patterns, and representative cases.

Published decisions

30,290

Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

41.6%

12,591 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 25 Aug 2026

How to use this page

Read the metrics first, then the ranked view.

The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.

Published decisions

30,290

Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

41.6%

12,591 upheld decisions

Leading firm

Shawbrook Bank Limited

1,508 decisions

Leading complaint theme

Affordability Assessment Failure

4,870 tagged decisions

Consumer Credit in the ombudsman corpus

Analysis

30,290 published decisions in this corpus sit within Consumer Credit. 41.6% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a useful public category page for spotting where complaint outcomes have tended to land.

Shawbrook Bank Limited is the single biggest firm exposure inside Consumer Credit in the published decision set. Affordability Assessment Failure is the leading complaint theme in the same category.

  • Latest year in the product series: 2026
  • Leading precedent signal: Consumer Credit Act 1974
  • Advisor uphold-risk signal: medium

How the product moved over time

Analysis

Consumer Credit has a multi-year decision trail in the corpus, which makes it possible to compare recent complaint pressure against earlier years rather than relying on a single snapshot.

In 2026, Consumer Credit recorded 1,835 published decisions with an upheld rate of 22.1%.

  • 2026: 1,835 decisions, 22.1% upheld
  • 2025: 6,201 decisions, 32.5% upheld
  • 2024: 4,479 decisions, 40.9% upheld
  • 2023: 4,266 decisions, 39.1% upheld
  • 2022: 5,905 decisions, 44.7% upheld

Themes, precedent signals, and handling implications

Analysis

affordability assessment failure, delay in claim handling, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in Consumer Credit. For public analysis, those tags are the closest durable “type” layer available in the dataset.

The existing advisor model also points to recurring handling implications for Consumer Credit, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 12.9% of cases), review section 75 cca precedent (appears in 8.6% of cases), and others.

  • Leading complaint theme: Affordability Assessment Failure

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-616036725 Aug 2026Not upheld

Creation Consumer Finance Limited · Consumer Credit

My final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs S to accept or reject my decision before 22 September 2026.

View source decision
DRN-622253525 Aug 2026Not upheld

Oodle Financial Services Limited · Consumer Credit

For the reasons I’ve explained, I don’t uphold this complaint. So, I don’t require Oodle Financial Services Limited to do anything more here.

View source decision
DRN-622562925 Aug 2026Not upheld

BMW Financial Services (GB) Limited · Consumer Credit

For the reasons explained, I don’t uphold Mr G’s complaint about BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES (GB) LIMITED. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr G to accept or reject my decision before 22 September 2026.

View source decision
DRN-626046725 Aug 2026Not upheld

Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Limited · Consumer Credit

For the reasons I’ve explained, I don’t uphold this complaint. So, I don’t require Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Limited to do anything more here.

View source decision
DRN-627260725 Aug 2026Not upheld

JBR Capital Limited · Consumer Credit

Whilst I understand why Mrs N may be disappointed with her agreement type, I’m not persuaded JBR have acted incorrectly or unfairly and so I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs N to accept or reject my decision before 22 September 2026.

View source decision