Tagged decisions
37,479
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Complaint theme analysis
A public analysis page for the complaint theme delay in claim handling, built from the root-cause tagging layer across published Financial Ombudsman decisions.
Page summary
37,479 published decisions tagged delay in claim handling, with upheld-rate context, product concentration, firm exposure, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Tagged decisions
37,479
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
36.8%
13,776 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 02 Feb 2026
Tagged decisions
37,479
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
36.8%
13,776 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and credit
14,384 decisions
Leading firm
Bank of Scotland Plc
1,664 decisions
37,479 published decisions in the corpus carry the complaint-theme tag delay in claim handling. 36.8% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this one of the most useful public “type” slices available in the dataset.
Banking and credit is the product line most often associated with this theme, while Bank of Scotland Plc is the firm that appears most often alongside it in published decisions.
Delay In Claim Handling has enough history in the published decisions to show how complaint pressure has evolved across multiple years, rather than appearing as a one-off issue cluster.
In 2026, delay in claim handling appeared in 135 published decisions with an upheld rate of 30.4%.
Banking and credit, Insurance (excluding PPI), Investment and pensions, and others are the product areas most associated with this theme in published decisions. That helps explain where this complaint type is most likely to appear in the ombudsman corpus.
Consumer Credit Act 1974, Section 75 Cca, Disp, and others are the most visible precedent signals tied to this complaint theme.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr I to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons outlined above, I’m not upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I don’t uphold the estate of Mr W’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask the estate of Mr W to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is I don’t uphold Mr J’s complaint against Handelsbanken plc. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr J to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decision