Published decisions
13,939
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Barclays Bank Plc, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
13,939
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
27.9%
3,893 upheld decisions
Page summary
13,939 published decisions involving Barclays Bank Plc, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
13,939
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
27.9%
3,893 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 17 Mar 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
13,939
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
27.9%
3,893 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and credit
6,620 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
1,638 tagged decisions
Barclays Bank Plc appears in 13,939 published decisions in this corpus. 27.9% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Banking and credit is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 6,620 decisions and an upheld rate of 20.4%.
Barclays Bank Plc's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, Barclays Bank Plc appeared in 6 published decisions with an upheld rate of 33.3%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Barclays Bank Plc in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Consumer Credit Act 1974, Section 75 Cca, Disp, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is that Barclays Bank PLC trading as Barclaycard has done enough to put things right. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr P to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionI do not uphold the complaint by the estate of Mrs B. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask the estate of Mrs B to accept or reject my decision before 17 March 2026.
View source decisionI uphold Mr T’s and Mrs T’s complaint, and I order Barclays Bank Plc to calculate and pay them redress and compensation as set out above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr T and Mrs T to accept or reject my decision before 5 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that Barclays Bank PLC must arrange for the MATCH list entry H complains of to be removed. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask H to accept or reject my decision before 4 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I do uphold Mr H’s complaint about Barclays Bank Plc. I direct Barclays Bank Plc to pay Mr H £325.
View source decision