Product analysis

Investments complaint analysis

A public view of how Investments performs in the published Financial Ombudsman decisions dataset, including volume, outcome mix, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.

Published decisions

7,598

Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

30.5%

2,319 upheld decisions

Page summary

7,598 published FOS decisions in Investments, with upheld-rate context, firm exposure, complaint themes, advisory patterns, and representative cases.

Published decisions

7,598

Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

30.5%

2,319 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 18 Aug 2026

How to use this page

Read the metrics first, then the ranked view.

The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.

Published decisions

7,598

Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

30.5%

2,319 upheld decisions

Leading firm

Aviva Life & Pensions UK Limited

398 decisions

Leading complaint theme

Delay In Claim Handling

1,022 tagged decisions

Investments in the ombudsman corpus

Analysis

7,598 published decisions in this corpus sit within Investments. 30.5% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a useful public category page for spotting where complaint outcomes have tended to land.

Aviva Life & Pensions UK Limited is the single biggest firm exposure inside Investments in the published decision set. Delay In Claim Handling is the leading complaint theme in the same category.

  • Latest year in the product series: 2026
  • Leading precedent signal: Cobs
  • Advisor uphold-risk signal: medium

How the product moved over time

Analysis

Investments has a multi-year decision trail in the corpus, which makes it possible to compare recent complaint pressure against earlier years rather than relying on a single snapshot.

In 2026, Investments recorded 212 published decisions with an upheld rate of 26.4%.

  • 2026: 212 decisions, 26.4% upheld
  • 2025: 961 decisions, 32.6% upheld
  • 2024: 1,242 decisions, 34.9% upheld
  • 2023: 1,457 decisions, 38.6% upheld
  • 2022: 1,518 decisions, 30.4% upheld

Themes, precedent signals, and handling implications

Analysis

delay in claim handling, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, communication failure, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in Investments. For public analysis, those tags are the closest durable “type” layer available in the dataset.

The existing advisor model also points to recurring handling implications for Investments, including review cobs precedent (appears in 0.4% of cases), review prin precedent (appears in 0.2% of cases), and others.

  • Leading complaint theme: Delay In Claim Handling

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-648832118 Aug 2026Not upheld

ETORO (UK) LIMITED · Investments

For the reasons given, my final decision is that I don’t uphold the complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr T to accept or reject my decision before 16 September 2026.

View source decision
DRN-649379418 Aug 2026Not upheld

Financial Administration Services Limited · Investments

For the reasons I’ve set out above, my final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr W to accept or reject my decision before 15 September 2026.

View source decision
DRN-650420718 Aug 2026Not upheld

Equiniti Financial Services Limited · Investments

For the reasons given, my final decision is that I don’t uphold the complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs D to accept or reject my decision before 16 September 2026.

View source decision
DRN-651885518 Aug 2026Not upheld

Scottish Widows Limited · Investments

For the reasons given above, I do not uphold this complaint against Scottish Widows Limited trading as Halifax Financial Services. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr H to accept or reject my decision before 15 September 2026.

View source decision
DRN-651886118 Aug 2026Not upheld

Scottish Widows Limited · Investments

For the reasons given above, I do not uphold this complaint against Scottish Widows Limited trading as Halifax Financial Services. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs H to accept or reject my decision before 15 September 2026.

View source decision