Published decisions
7,611
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Product analysis
A public view of how Investments performs in the published Financial Ombudsman decisions dataset, including volume, outcome mix, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Published decisions
7,611
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.5%
2,322 upheld decisions
Page summary
7,611 published FOS decisions in Investments, with upheld-rate context, firm exposure, complaint themes, advisory patterns, and representative cases.
Published decisions
7,611
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.5%
2,322 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 25 Aug 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
7,611
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.5%
2,322 upheld decisions
Leading firm
Aviva Life & Pensions UK Limited
399 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
1,030 tagged decisions
7,611 published decisions in this corpus sit within Investments. 30.5% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a useful public category page for spotting where complaint outcomes have tended to land.
Aviva Life & Pensions UK Limited is the single biggest firm exposure inside Investments in the published decision set. Delay In Claim Handling is the leading complaint theme in the same category.
Investments has a multi-year decision trail in the corpus, which makes it possible to compare recent complaint pressure against earlier years rather than relying on a single snapshot.
In 2026, Investments recorded 225 published decisions with an upheld rate of 26.2%.
delay in claim handling, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, communication failure, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in Investments. For public analysis, those tags are the closest durable “type” layer available in the dataset.
The existing advisor model also points to recurring handling implications for Investments, including review cobs precedent (appears in 0.4% of cases), review prin precedent (appears in 0.2% of cases), and others.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
St. James's Place Wealth Management Plc has offered to pay Mr B £1,486.
View source decisionFor the reasons set out above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr A to accept or reject my decision before 21 September 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve explained, my final decision is that I don’t uphold Mr E’s complaint against JP Morgan Personal Investing Limited. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr E to accept or reject my decision before 21 September 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons set out above, I’m not upholding Mr B, Mrs B and Mr H’s complaint (in their capacity as trustees of the Mr and Mrs B Loan Trust). Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr B, Mrs B and Mr H as Trustees of the Mr & Mrs B Loan Trust to accept or reject my decision before 21 September 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons given, my decision is that I’m not asking Financial Administration Services Limited to do anything. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs M, Mr S, Mr S and Mrs S of the Trust to accept or reject my decision before 21 September 2026.
View source decision