Published decisions
7,545
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Product analysis
A public view of how Investments performs in the published Financial Ombudsman decisions dataset, including volume, outcome mix, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Published decisions
7,545
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.6%
2,306 upheld decisions
Page summary
7,545 published FOS decisions in Investments, with upheld-rate context, firm exposure, complaint themes, advisory patterns, and representative cases.
Published decisions
7,545
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.6%
2,306 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 07 Jul 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
7,545
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.6%
2,306 upheld decisions
Leading firm
Aviva Life & Pensions UK Limited
397 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
994 tagged decisions
7,545 published decisions in this corpus sit within Investments. 30.6% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a useful public category page for spotting where complaint outcomes have tended to land.
Aviva Life & Pensions UK Limited is the single biggest firm exposure inside Investments in the published decision set. Delay In Claim Handling is the leading complaint theme in the same category.
Investments has a multi-year decision trail in the corpus, which makes it possible to compare recent complaint pressure against earlier years rather than relying on a single snapshot.
In 2026, Investments recorded 159 published decisions with an upheld rate of 27.0%.
delay in claim handling, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, communication failure, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in Investments. For public analysis, those tags are the closest durable “type” layer available in the dataset.
The existing advisor model also points to recurring handling implications for Investments, including review cobs precedent (appears in 0.4% of cases), review prin precedent (appears in 0.2% of cases), and others.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
For the reasons I’ve explained above, my decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr G to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons given above, I do not uphold Mr A's complaint about Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr A to accept or reject my decision before 22 July 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I have given above, I do not uphold Mr M's complaint against Robinhood U. K.
View source decisionFor the reasons given above, I do not uphold this complaint against Etoro (UK) Limited. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr K to accept or reject my decision before 3 August 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons explained above. I’m not upholding this complaint.
View source decision