Published decisions
561
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
561
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
18.0%
101 upheld decisions
Page summary
561 published decisions involving Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
561
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
18.0%
101 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 17 Mar 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
561
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
18.0%
101 upheld decisions
Leading product
Investments
279 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
113 tagged decisions
Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited appears in 561 published decisions in this corpus. 18.0% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Investments is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 279 decisions and an upheld rate of 15.8%.
Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited appeared in 5 published decisions with an upheld rate of 60.0%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Cobs, Disp, Fca Principles are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
For the reasons I’ve given above, I uphold this complaint and direct Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited to put things right as I’ve set out above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr H to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold Ms T’s complaint and require Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited to pay the sum above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Ms T to accept or reject my decision before 3 April 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve set out above, my final decision is that I uphold this complaint. Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited trading as Hargreaves Lansdown must pay Mr C the amount set out above.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve set out above, my final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask the estate of Mr B to accept or reject my decision before 17 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold Ms S’ complaint and direct Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Management Limited to put things right as detailed above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Ms S to accept or reject my decision before 4 March 2026.
View source decision