Product analysis

Banking and Payments complaint analysis

A public view of how Banking and Payments performs in the published Financial Ombudsman decisions dataset, including volume, outcome mix, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.

Published decisions

54,484

Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

28.7%

15,647 upheld decisions

Page summary

54,484 published FOS decisions in Banking and Payments, with upheld-rate context, firm exposure, complaint themes, advisory patterns, and representative cases.

Published decisions

54,484

Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

28.7%

15,647 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 07 Jul 2026

How to use this page

Read the metrics first, then the ranked view.

The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.

Published decisions

54,484

Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus

Upheld rate

28.7%

15,647 upheld decisions

Leading firm

Barclays Bank UK PLC

6,228 decisions

Leading complaint theme

Fraud Or Scam Concern

15,117 tagged decisions

Banking and Payments in the ombudsman corpus

Analysis

54,484 published decisions in this corpus sit within Banking and Payments. 28.7% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a useful public category page for spotting where complaint outcomes have tended to land.

Barclays Bank UK PLC is the single biggest firm exposure inside Banking and Payments in the published decision set. Fraud Or Scam Concern is the leading complaint theme in the same category.

  • Latest year in the product series: 2026
  • Leading precedent signal: Consumer Credit Act 1974
  • Advisor uphold-risk signal: low

How the product moved over time

Analysis

Banking and Payments has a multi-year decision trail in the corpus, which makes it possible to compare recent complaint pressure against earlier years rather than relying on a single snapshot.

In 2026, Banking and Payments recorded 2,015 published decisions with an upheld rate of 19.1%.

  • 2026: 2,015 decisions, 19.1% upheld
  • 2025: 13,903 decisions, 24.7% upheld
  • 2024: 10,946 decisions, 33.9% upheld
  • 2023: 8,694 decisions, 32.8% upheld
  • 2022: 8,600 decisions, 30.8% upheld

Themes, precedent signals, and handling implications

Analysis

fraud or scam concern, delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in Banking and Payments. For public analysis, those tags are the closest durable “type” layer available in the dataset.

The existing advisor model also points to recurring handling implications for Banking and Payments, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 2.7% of cases), review section 75 cca precedent (appears in 1.9% of cases), and others.

  • Leading complaint theme: Fraud Or Scam Concern

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-589913507 Jul 2026Not upheld

MONZO BANK LIMITED · Banking and Payments

For the reasons I’ve explained, my final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr G to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision
DRN-592896307 Jul 2026Upheld

Barclays Bank UK PLC · Banking and Payments

For the reasons above, my final decision is that Barclays Bank UK PLC’s offer of £400 is fair. It should pay this to Mr E if it hasn’t already.

View source decision
DRN-598672207 Jul 2026Not upheld

Barclays Bank UK PLC · Banking and Payments

For the reasons stated above I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss C to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision
DRN-603105707 Jul 2026Not upheld

HSBC UK Bank Plc · Banking and Payments

For the reasons set out above, I don’t require HSBC UK Bank Plc to take any further action. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr and Mrs J to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision
DRN-605667707 Jul 2026Not upheld

Clydesdale Bank Plc · Banking and Payments

My final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr C to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision