Published decisions
54,087
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Product analysis
A public view of how Banking and Payments performs in the published Financial Ombudsman decisions dataset, including volume, outcome mix, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Published decisions
54,087
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
28.8%
15,582 upheld decisions
Page summary
54,087 published FOS decisions in Banking and Payments, with upheld-rate context, firm exposure, complaint themes, advisory patterns, and representative cases.
Published decisions
54,087
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
28.8%
15,582 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 21 Apr 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
54,087
Product-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
28.8%
15,582 upheld decisions
Leading firm
Barclays Bank UK PLC
6,194 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Fraud Or Scam Concern
14,922 tagged decisions
54,087 published decisions in this corpus sit within Banking and Payments. 28.8% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a useful public category page for spotting where complaint outcomes have tended to land.
Barclays Bank UK PLC is the single biggest firm exposure inside Banking and Payments in the published decision set. Fraud Or Scam Concern is the leading complaint theme in the same category.
Banking and Payments has a multi-year decision trail in the corpus, which makes it possible to compare recent complaint pressure against earlier years rather than relying on a single snapshot.
In 2026, Banking and Payments recorded 1,620 published decisions with an upheld rate of 19.8%.
fraud or scam concern, delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in Banking and Payments. For public analysis, those tags are the closest durable “type” layer available in the dataset.
The existing advisor model also points to recurring handling implications for Banking and Payments, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 2.7% of cases), review section 75 cca precedent (appears in 1.9% of cases), and others.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint about Metro Bank PLC. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask D to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons given above, it’s my final decision not to uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss A to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss S to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decisionI am upholding Miss P’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss P to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decision