Published decisions
7,047
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving HSBC UK Bank Plc, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
7,047
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
29.2%
2,057 upheld decisions
Page summary
7,047 published decisions involving HSBC UK Bank Plc, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
7,047
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
29.2%
2,057 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 17 Mar 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
7,047
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
29.2%
2,057 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and Payments
4,712 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Fraud Or Scam Concern
1,762 tagged decisions
HSBC UK Bank Plc appears in 7,047 published decisions in this corpus. 29.2% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Banking and Payments is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 4,712 decisions and an upheld rate of 32.2%.
HSBC UK Bank Plc's decision trail runs from 2018 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, HSBC UK Bank Plc appeared in 107 published decisions with an upheld rate of 34.6%.
Fraud Or Scam Concern is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to HSBC UK Bank Plc in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Consumer Credit Act 1974, Disp, Section 75 Cca, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is that HSBC UK Bank Plc trading as first direct should take the actions set out above in resolution of this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr G to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr C to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons explained, I uphold this complaint in part and I direct HSBC UK Bank Plc to puts things right by doing what I’ve said above it should do. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs C and Mr H to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons explained, I uphold this complaint and I direct HSBC UK Bank Plc to put things right by doing what I’ve said above it should do. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs C to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold this complaint, but I don’t require First Direct to do anything further. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Ms P to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decision