Tagged decisions
3,648
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Complaint theme analysis
A public analysis page for the complaint theme policy wording ambiguity, built from the root-cause tagging layer across published Financial Ombudsman decisions.
Tagged decisions
3,648
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
43.1%
1,574 upheld decisions
Page summary
3,648 published decisions tagged policy wording ambiguity, with upheld-rate context, product concentration, firm exposure, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Tagged decisions
3,648
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
43.1%
1,574 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 25 Aug 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Tagged decisions
3,648
Published decisions carrying this complaint-theme tag
Upheld rate
43.1%
1,574 upheld decisions
Leading product
Insurance (excluding PPI)
1,835 decisions
Leading firm
UK Insurance Limited
148 decisions
3,648 published decisions in the corpus carry the complaint-theme tag policy wording ambiguity. 43.1% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this one of the most useful public “type” slices available in the dataset.
Insurance (excluding PPI) is the product line most often associated with this theme, while UK Insurance Limited is the firm that appears most often alongside it in published decisions.
Policy Wording Ambiguity has enough history in the published decisions to show how complaint pressure has evolved across multiple years, rather than appearing as a one-off issue cluster.
In 2026, policy wording ambiguity appeared in 177 published decisions with an upheld rate of 29.9%.
Insurance (excluding PPI), Payment protection insurance (PPI), Banking and credit, and others are the product areas most associated with this theme in published decisions. That helps explain where this complaint type is most likely to appear in the ombudsman corpus.
Consumer Credit Act 1974, Disp, Section 75 Cca, and others are the most visible precedent signals tied to this complaint theme.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
I uphold Mr C’s complaint against Accelerant Insurance UK Limited. I now direct Accelerant Insurance UK Limited to settle and pay Mr C using the formula set out above.
View source decisionFor the reasons given, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr E to accept or reject my decision before 22 September 2026.
View source decisionBecause of the reasons given above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs G and Mr G to accept or reject my decision before 22 September 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons outlined above, my final decision is that I uphold this complaint. Subject to my comments above, I require Acasta European Insurance Company Limited to: • Recalculate the replacement vehicle cost using the Glass’s guide retail valuation at the point of total loss, using a vehicle of the same specification, age and mileage as Mr C’s vehicle on the date he purchased it.
View source decisionFor the reasons explained, I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs C to accept or reject my decision before 21 September 2026.
View source decision