Published decisions
4,991
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Aviva Insurance Limited, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
4,991
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.1%
1,504 upheld decisions
Page summary
4,991 published decisions involving Aviva Insurance Limited, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
4,991
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.1%
1,504 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 25 Aug 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
4,991
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.1%
1,504 upheld decisions
Leading product
Insurance
2,774 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
614 tagged decisions
Aviva Insurance Limited appears in 4,991 published decisions in this corpus. 30.1% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Insurance is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 2,774 decisions and an upheld rate of 33.1%.
Aviva Insurance Limited's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, Aviva Insurance Limited appeared in 110 published decisions with an upheld rate of 29.1%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Aviva Insurance Limited in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Icobs, Disp, Insurance Act 2015, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
I uphold this complaint. I require Aviva to pay a total of £250 compensation.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold this complaint in part. Aviva Insurance Limited should: • pay Mrs V a total of £300 compensation for the distress, inconvenience and loss of expectation she was caused.
View source decisionI do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask B to accept or reject my decision before 21 September 2026.
View source decisionI uphold this complaint and require Aviva Insurance Limited to put things right in the way described above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr T to accept or reject my decision before 21 September 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold this complaint. I require Aviva Insurance Limited to pay Mrs P £100 compensation for distress and inconvenience (plus the £175 it offered initially, so £275 in total).
View source decision