Published decisions
10,182
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving HSBC Bank plc, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
10,182
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
38.1%
3,876 upheld decisions
Page summary
10,182 published decisions involving HSBC Bank plc, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
10,182
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
38.1%
3,876 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 24 Jul 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
10,182
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
38.1%
3,876 upheld decisions
Leading product
Payment protection insurance (PPI)
5,543 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
813 tagged decisions
HSBC Bank plc appears in 10,182 published decisions in this corpus. 38.1% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Payment protection insurance (PPI) is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 5,543 decisions and an upheld rate of 57.0%.
HSBC Bank plc's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, HSBC Bank plc appeared in 2 published decisions with an upheld rate of 50.0%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to HSBC Bank plc in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Consumer Credit Act 1974, Section 75 Cca, Disp, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr G to accept or reject my decision before 21 August 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve explained above, I uphold this complaint against HSBC Bank Plc and require it to put things right as set out above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr B to accept or reject my decision before 31 July 2026.
View source decisionDRN-3253785 The complaint Mr and Mrs H complain that HSBC Bank Plc (“HSBC”) set up a payment protection insurance (“PPI”) policy without their consent. What happened HSBC wrote to Mr and Mrs H in August 2018 to explain that when increasing the benefit of an existing PPI policy in July 2001... (2 pages)
View source decisionDRN-2202349 The complaint Mr J and Mr J are unhappy with the amount of compensation HSBC Bank Plc has offered to settle their complaint about a mis-sold payment protection insurance (PPI) policy taken out alongside a business loan. What happened Mr J and Mr J took out a single premium PPI ... (2 pages)
View source decisionDRN-2224672 The complaint This complaint is about a payment protection insurance (PPI) policy taken out to protect a mortgage in 1998. Mr H says HSBC UK Bank Plc mis-sold him the PPI. What I’ve decided – and why I’ve considered all the available evidence and arguments to decide what’s fair... (2 pages)
View source decision