Published decisions
27,326
2022 decision volume in the public corpus
Year analysis
Detailed public analysis of the 2022 published Financial Ombudsman decision set, including complaint volume, outcome mix, product concentration, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Page summary
27,326 published FOS decisions in 2022, including upheld-rate context, top firms, top products, recurring complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
27,326
2022 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
36.3%
9,930 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 31 Dec 2022
Published decisions
27,326
2022 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
36.3%
9,930 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and Payments
31.5% of annual decisions
Leading firm
Barclays Bank UK PLC
1,540 published decisions
27,326 published ombudsman decisions landed in 2022. 36.3% of those decisions were upheld, while 63.7% were not upheld. That makes 2022 a meaningful benchmark year for understanding where complaint pressure and adjudication risk sat across the corpus.
Banking and Payments was the heaviest product area, accounting for 8,600 decisions. Barclays Bank UK PLC appeared most often at firm level. The most frequently tagged complaint theme was fraud or scam concern.
The year was led by Banking and Payments, Insurance, Consumer Credit, and others, which together represented the centre of complaint activity in the published decisions for 2022.
Banking and Payments alone contributed 31.5% of all decisions published in 2022, which makes it the clearest lens for understanding how complaint pressure expressed itself that year.
Barclays Bank UK PLC, HSBC UK Bank Plc, Lloyds Bank PLC, and others were the most visible firms in the published decisions for 2022. That does not prove complaint prevalence in a consumer-market sense, but it does show which firms were most exposed in the final ombudsman decisions dataset.
Complaint-theme tagging pointed most strongly to fraud or scam concern, delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, and others. These themes are the most useful public proxy for “complaint type” in this corpus because the raw decisions are not stored with a dedicated complaint-type field.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
DRN-3811222 The complaint Mr and Mrs C have complained that Casualty & General Insurance Company (Europe) Limited (C&G) has declined their claims for treatment of their dog on the ground that the conditions claimed for were pre-existing and are therefore excluded by their policy. W... (3 pages)
View source decisionDRN-3877265 The complaint Mr S complains National Westminster Bank Plc (NatWest) unfairly prevented him making a payment to purchase premium savings bonds, without offering him any alternative options. What happened Mr S says he attempted to make an online payment for £50,000 to purchase p... (3 pages)
View source decisionDRN-3327965 The complaint Mrs C is unhappy Phoenix Life Limited won’t extend her policy in line with the increase in retirement age. Phoenix Life are responsible for this complaint following a transfer of business with the previous provider. What happened In 1987 Mrs C took out a policy th... (2 pages)
View source decisionDRN-3353336 The complaint Mr W complained that he was given unsuitable advice to transfer his defined benefit (DB) British Steel Pension Scheme (BSPS), to a personal pension plan. Beacon IFA Limited is responsible for answering this complaint and so to keep things consistent, I’ll refer ma... (11 pages)
View source decisionDRN-3517329 The complaint Mr E complains about Watkin Davies Insurance Consultants Limited’s advice to switch his pension from Aviva to a self-invested personal pension (SIPP) with LV=. He says that his fund with Aviva was a top ten fund already. If he had been correctly advised to do noth... (6 pages)
View source decision