Published decisions
29,837
2021 decision volume in the public corpus
Year analysis
Detailed public analysis of the 2021 published Financial Ombudsman decision set, including complaint volume, outcome mix, product concentration, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Page summary
29,837 published FOS decisions in 2021, including upheld-rate context, top firms, top products, recurring complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
29,837
2021 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
31.9%
9,525 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 31 Dec 2021
Published decisions
29,837
2021 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
31.9%
9,525 upheld decisions
Leading product
Insurance
34.9% of annual decisions
Leading firm
AXA France IARD
1,783 published decisions
29,837 published ombudsman decisions landed in 2021. 31.9% of those decisions were upheld, while 68.1% were not upheld. That makes 2021 a meaningful benchmark year for understanding where complaint pressure and adjudication risk sat across the corpus.
Insurance was the heaviest product area, accounting for 10,419 decisions. AXA France IARD appeared most often at firm level. The most frequently tagged complaint theme was non-disclosure or misrepresentation.
The year was led by Insurance, Banking and Payments, Consumer Credit, and others, which together represented the centre of complaint activity in the published decisions for 2021.
Insurance alone contributed 34.9% of all decisions published in 2021, which makes it the clearest lens for understanding how complaint pressure expressed itself that year.
AXA France IARD, Bank of Scotland Plc, Barclays Bank UK PLC, and others were the most visible firms in the published decisions for 2021. That does not prove complaint prevalence in a consumer-market sense, but it does show which firms were most exposed in the final ombudsman decisions dataset.
Complaint-theme tagging pointed most strongly to non-disclosure or misrepresentation, delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, and others. These themes are the most useful public proxy for “complaint type” in this corpus because the raw decisions are not stored with a dedicated complaint-type field.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
DRN-2245690 The complaint Mr T on behalf of J Ltd complains that Barclays Bank Plc (trading as Barclays Commercial) didn’t appropriately handle a claim of disputed transactions. Mrs T is Mr T’s representative but I’ll treat all the submissions as having come from J Ltd for ease of reading.... (2 pages)
View source decisionDRN-2648239 The complaint Mr and Mrs B complain through their representative, a claims management company (CMC), that Aviva Life and Pensions UK Limited gave them unsuitable investment advice. What happened The background to this complaint is well known to both parties so I won’t go over i... (5 pages)
View source decisionDRN-2785714 The complaint M, a limited company, is seeking to recover £12,744.35 from Barclays Bank UK PLC (“Barclays”), which was stolen from its business banking account as a result of a third-party scam. The owner of M, Mr G, is bringing the complaint on its behalf so I will refer to hi... (6 pages)
View source decisionDRN-2965839 The complaint Mr P complains that Santander UK Plc did not do enough to recover the money he paid to an investment scam company. What happened The circumstances of this complaint are well known to both parties, so I will not repeat them all again here in detail. But I will prov... (3 pages)
View source decisionDRN-3021790 The complaint Ms T, as a sole trader, complains about the decision to decline her business interruption insurance claim made by The National Farmers' Union Mutual Insurance Society Limited. Ms T’s claim relates to losses incurred following the COVID-19 pandemic. What happe... (3 pages)
View source decision