Year + product analysis

Insurance complaints in 2026

A curated public analysis of Insurance in 2026, combining annual and product-level signals from the published Financial Ombudsman decision corpus.

Published decisions

1,056

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

30.7%

324 upheld decisions

Page summary

1,056 published FOS decisions in Insurance during 2026, with upheld-rate context, firm concentration, complaint themes, and representative cases.

Published decisions

1,056

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

30.7%

324 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 07 Jul 2026

How to use this page

Read the metrics first, then the ranked view.

The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.

Published decisions

1,056

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

30.7%

324 upheld decisions

Leading firm

Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited

74 decisions

Leading complaint theme

Delay In Claim Handling

331 tagged decisions

Insurance in 2026

Analysis

1,056 published decisions in the corpus sit in Insurance for 2026. 30.7% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a strong public cross-section for understanding how one product behaved in one specific year.

Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited is the most visible firm inside this year-product slice, with 74 published decisions.

  • 2026: 1,056 decisions, 30.7% upheld
  • Leading complaint theme: Delay In Claim Handling
  • Leading precedent signal: Icobs

Firm concentration and issue profile

Analysis

Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited, Aviva Insurance Limited, U K Insurance Limited, and others are the firms most often associated with Insurance complaints in 2026. This gives a much tighter public view than the standalone year or product pages alone.

delay in claim handling, policy wording ambiguity, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in this year-product combination.

  • Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited: 74 decisions, 29.7% upheld
  • Aviva Insurance Limited: 69 decisions, 30.4% upheld
  • U K Insurance Limited: 61 decisions, 32.8% upheld
  • AXA Insurance UK Plc: 42 decisions, 30.9% upheld
  • Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Limited: 36 decisions, 38.9% upheld

Handling implications and precedent context

Analysis

The advisory layer for Insurance points to recurring handling implications here, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 1.3% of cases), review section 140a cca precedent (appears in 1.1% of cases), review disp precedent (appears in 0.3% of cases), and others.

There is no strong “what loses” signal exposed for this product at the current advisory granularity.

  • Leading complaint theme: Delay In Claim Handling

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-599591307 Jul 2026Not upheld

Domestic & General Insurance Plc · Insurance

My final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr R to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision
DRN-612606107 Jul 2026Not upheld

Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited · Insurance

My final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr D to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision
DRN-613865407 Jul 2026Not upheld

Motors Insurance Company Limited · Insurance

For the reasons I stated above, it’s my final decision that I am not upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr C to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision
DRN-621157207 Jul 2026Not upheld

Zurich Insurance Company Ltd · Insurance

Zurich Insurance Company Limited has already offered to pay Miss C £400 compensation to settle the complaint and I think this offer is fair in all of the circumstances. So, my final decision is that Zurich Insurance Company Limited should pay Miss C £400 compensation if it hasn’t done so already.

View source decision
DRN-621377107 Jul 2026Not upheld

Astrenska Insurance Limited · Insurance

I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision