Published decisions
1,670
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Firm + product analysis
A curated public analysis of Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited's published Financial Ombudsman decisions in Insurance, including outcome context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,670
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
49.5%
826 upheld decisions
Page summary
1,670 published FOS decisions involving Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited in Insurance, with upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,670
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
49.5%
826 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 21 Apr 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
1,670
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
49.5%
826 upheld decisions
Latest active year
2026
58 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
62 tagged decisions
Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited appears in 1,670 published decisions in Insurance across this corpus. 49.5% of those decisions were upheld, making this one of the strongest public firm-product slices available for search and research.
The latest year represented in this slice is 2026, with 58 published decisions and an upheld rate of 32.8%.
Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited has a multi-year published decision trail in Insurance, which makes it possible to judge whether complaint exposure has been persistent or concentrated into a smaller set of years.
Insurance remains a meaningful part of Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited's published complaint exposure, but this page isolates just that one product line instead of blending it with the firm's wider footprint.
Delay In Claim Handling is the clearest complaint-theme signal in this firm-product slice, which helps explain what tends to drive published ombudsman decisions here.
The product advisory layer also points to recurring handling implications, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 1.3% of cases), review section 140a cca precedent (appears in 1.1% of cases), review disp precedent (appears in 0.3% of cases), and others.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
It’s my final decision that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs J to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons set out above I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss D to accept or reject my decision before 18 May 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold this complaint. I require Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited to pay Miss H further compensation in the sum of £100.
View source decisionFor the reasons given above, I partly uphold Mr M’s complaint, and I require Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited to do the following in response to his complaint; - - To re-consider and if appropriate to process Mr M’s claim on the basis that the lost and damaged contents are treated as ‘garden contents’ for the purposes of the relevant policy. - To pay Mr M £400 in compensation for the distress and inconvenien...
View source decisionMy final decision is that I do not uphold Mr M’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 14 May 2026.
View source decision