Published decisions
1,762
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Firm + product analysis
A curated public analysis of Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited's published Financial Ombudsman decisions in Insurance, including outcome context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,762
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
48.5%
855 upheld decisions
Page summary
1,762 published FOS decisions involving Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited in Insurance, with upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,762
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
48.5%
855 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 15 Sept 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
1,762
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
48.5%
855 upheld decisions
Latest active year
2026
150 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
96 tagged decisions
Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited appears in 1,762 published decisions in Insurance across this corpus. 48.5% of those decisions were upheld, making this one of the strongest public firm-product slices available for search and research.
The latest year represented in this slice is 2026, with 150 published decisions and an upheld rate of 32.0%.
Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited has a multi-year published decision trail in Insurance, which makes it possible to judge whether complaint exposure has been persistent or concentrated into a smaller set of years.
Insurance remains a meaningful part of Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited's published complaint exposure, but this page isolates just that one product line instead of blending it with the firm's wider footprint.
Delay In Claim Handling is the clearest complaint-theme signal in this firm-product slice, which helps explain what tends to drive published ombudsman decisions here.
The product advisory layer also points to recurring handling implications, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 1.3% of cases), review section 140a cca precedent (appears in 1.1% of cases), review disp precedent (appears in 0.3% of cases), and others.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
I uphold Miss D’s complaint about Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited and require it to do what I’ve set out above in the ‘Putting things right’ section. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss D to accept or reject my decision before 13 October 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I have set out above, my final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint or require Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited to do anything more in relation to it. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 12 October 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve given, it’s my final decision that I do not uphold this complaint and I make no award against Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Ms A to accept or reject my decision before 12 October 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I stated above, I am not upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr K to accept or reject my decision before 12 October 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold this complaint and I direct Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited to put things right as I’ve set out above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask P to accept or reject my decision before 12 October 2026.
View source decision