Published decisions
1,745
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,745
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
49.3%
860 upheld decisions
Page summary
1,745 published decisions involving Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,745
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
49.3%
860 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 17 Mar 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
1,745
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
49.3%
860 upheld decisions
Leading product
Insurance
1,652 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
83 tagged decisions
Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited appears in 1,745 published decisions in this corpus. 49.3% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Insurance is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 1,652 decisions and an upheld rate of 49.6%.
Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited's decision trail runs from 2014 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited appeared in 40 published decisions with an upheld rate of 30.0%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Icobs, Insurance Act 2015 are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
For the reasons I’ve explained, my final decision is that I uphold this complaint in part. I direct Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited to pay Mr F, insofar as it hasn’t already paid him, £100.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve explained, my final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. I don’t direct Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited to do any more in response to this complaint.
View source decisionI uphold this complaint. I require Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited to settle the matter as outlined under the ‘Putting things right’ heading above.
View source decisionFor the reasons set out above, my final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 13 April 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve explained, my final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. I don’t direct Admiral Insurance (Gibraltar) Limited to do any more in response to this complaint.
View source decision