Published decisions
27,617
2024 decision volume in the public corpus
Year analysis
Detailed public analysis of the 2024 published Financial Ombudsman decision set, including complaint volume, outcome mix, product concentration, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Page summary
27,617 published FOS decisions in 2024, including upheld-rate context, top firms, top products, recurring complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
27,617
2024 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
40.1%
11,082 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 31 Dec 2024
Published decisions
27,617
2024 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
40.1%
11,082 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and Payments
39.6% of annual decisions
Leading firm
Barclays Bank UK PLC
1,510 published decisions
27,617 published ombudsman decisions landed in 2024. 40.1% of those decisions were upheld, while 59.9% were not upheld. That makes 2024 a meaningful benchmark year for understanding where complaint pressure and adjudication risk sat across the corpus.
Banking and Payments was the heaviest product area, accounting for 10,946 decisions. Barclays Bank UK PLC appeared most often at firm level. The most frequently tagged complaint theme was fraud or scam concern.
The year was led by Banking and Payments, Insurance, Consumer Credit, and others, which together represented the centre of complaint activity in the published decisions for 2024.
Banking and Payments alone contributed 39.6% of all decisions published in 2024, which makes it the clearest lens for understanding how complaint pressure expressed itself that year.
Barclays Bank UK PLC, Santander UK Plc, HSBC UK Bank Plc, and others were the most visible firms in the published decisions for 2024. That does not prove complaint prevalence in a consumer-market sense, but it does show which firms were most exposed in the final ombudsman decisions dataset.
Complaint-theme tagging pointed most strongly to fraud or scam concern, delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, and others. These themes are the most useful public proxy for “complaint type” in this corpus because the raw decisions are not stored with a dedicated complaint-type field.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
DRN-4580461 The complaint Mr H complains that he relied upon information by to him by Scottish Widows Limited (Scottish Widows) which it knew to be incorrect, and he suffered losses as a result. What happened The history leading up to this complaint is well known to the parties and has ... (3 pages)
View source decisionDRN-4602966 The complaint Mr T complains Barclays Bank UK PLC failed to deal with his request for information in a timely manner. What happened In June 2023, following a chargeback claim on his debit card, Mr T submitted a Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) to Barclays. This was becaus... (2 pages)
View source decisionDRN-4770975 The complaint Ms B complains that Monzo Bank Ltd registered a fraud prevention marker against her without due cause. What happened In April 2023, Ms B received three payments into her account totalling £820. The funds were then quickly withdrawn from an ATM and transferred o... (3 pages)
View source decisionDRN-4858348 The complaint Ms S complains that J M Finn & Co Ltd (“JMF”) unsuitably managed her general investment and SIPP portfolios. She feels the level of risk they were exposed to was too high, primarily due to an over exposure of technology stocks, resulting in a significant lo... (6 pages)
View source decisionDRN-4889100 The complaint Miss P complains that J M Finn & Co Ltd (“JMF”) managed her general investment portfolio in a manner inappropriate to her personal circumstances, resulting in a significant loss in value during early 2022, impacting the level of income the portfolio was abl... (5 pages)
View source decision