Published decisions
26,747
2019 decision volume in the public corpus
Year analysis
Detailed public analysis of the 2019 published Financial Ombudsman decision set, including complaint volume, outcome mix, product concentration, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Page summary
26,747 published FOS decisions in 2019, including upheld-rate context, top firms, top products, recurring complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
26,747
2019 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.4%
8,140 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 31 Dec 2019
Published decisions
26,747
2019 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.4%
8,140 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and credit
39.0% of annual decisions
Leading firm
Bank of Scotland Plc
2,448 published decisions
26,747 published ombudsman decisions landed in 2019. 30.4% of those decisions were upheld, while 69.6% were not upheld. That makes 2019 a meaningful benchmark year for understanding where complaint pressure and adjudication risk sat across the corpus.
Banking and credit was the heaviest product area, accounting for 10,429 decisions. Bank of Scotland Plc appeared most often at firm level. The most frequently tagged complaint theme was delay in claim handling.
The year was led by Banking and credit, Payment protection insurance (PPI), Insurance (excluding PPI), and others, which together represented the centre of complaint activity in the published decisions for 2019.
Banking and credit alone contributed 39.0% of all decisions published in 2019, which makes it the clearest lens for understanding how complaint pressure expressed itself that year.
Bank of Scotland Plc, Lloyds Bank PLC, Barclays Bank UK PLC, and others were the most visible firms in the published decisions for 2019. That does not prove complaint prevalence in a consumer-market sense, but it does show which firms were most exposed in the final ombudsman decisions dataset.
Complaint-theme tagging pointed most strongly to delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, and others. These themes are the most useful public proxy for “complaint type” in this corpus because the raw decisions are not stored with a dedicated complaint-type field.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
DRN-1065418 The complaintMr F complains Barclays Bank UK PLC (trading as “Barclaycard”) is no longer providing him with money transfer offers on his credit card account. What happenedMr F has taken several money transfer offers from Barclays over the last two years or so. But Barclays hasn... (2 pages)
View source decisionDRN-1135507The complaintMr and Mrs F complain that Bank of Scotland plc trading as Halifax’(‘Halifax’) mis-sold them a monthly premium payment protection insurance (‘PPI’) policy taken out in 2000 when they applied for a joint loan. What happenedMr and Mrs F complained to this Service. Our... (2 pages)
View source decisionThe complaint This complaint is about a monthly premium payment protection insurance (PPI) policy taken out in 2007. Mr M says HSBC UK Bank Plc mis-sold him the PPI. What happened Mr M complained to this Service. Our adjudicator rejected his complaint. Mr M disagreed with our adjudicator&a... (2 pages)
View source decisionComplaint Mrs and Mr B say Bank of Scotland plc, trading as Halifax, mis-sold them a Total Mortgage Protection Plan (TMPP). A TMPP is a type of protection policy which typically includes mortgage payment protection insurance (PPI) together with other features, such as life insurance and c... (2 pages)
View source decisionThe complaint Mr F is unhappy Barclays Bank UK PLC (trading as “Barclaycard”) wouldn’t give him a money transfer offer on his credit card account when he asked for one. What happened Mr F has a credit card account with Barclays. He says he called Barclays in October 2019 to ask if he could... (2 pages)
View source decision