Published decisions
33,811
2018 decision volume in the public corpus
Year analysis
Detailed public analysis of the 2018 published Financial Ombudsman decision set, including complaint volume, outcome mix, product concentration, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Page summary
33,811 published FOS decisions in 2018, including upheld-rate context, top firms, top products, recurring complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
33,811
2018 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
37.2%
12,573 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 31 Dec 2018
Published decisions
33,811
2018 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
37.2%
12,573 upheld decisions
Leading product
Payment protection insurance (PPI)
45.9% of annual decisions
Leading firm
Bank of Scotland Plc
3,626 published decisions
33,811 published ombudsman decisions landed in 2018. 37.2% of those decisions were upheld, while 62.8% were not upheld. That makes 2018 a meaningful benchmark year for understanding where complaint pressure and adjudication risk sat across the corpus.
Payment protection insurance (PPI) was the heaviest product area, accounting for 15,511 decisions. Bank of Scotland Plc appeared most often at firm level. The most frequently tagged complaint theme was delay in claim handling.
The year was led by Payment protection insurance (PPI), Banking and credit, Insurance (excluding PPI), and others, which together represented the centre of complaint activity in the published decisions for 2018.
Payment protection insurance (PPI) alone contributed 45.9% of all decisions published in 2018, which makes it the clearest lens for understanding how complaint pressure expressed itself that year.
Bank of Scotland Plc, Lloyds Bank PLC, Barclays Bank Plc, and others were the most visible firms in the published decisions for 2018. That does not prove complaint prevalence in a consumer-market sense, but it does show which firms were most exposed in the final ombudsman decisions dataset.
Complaint-theme tagging pointed most strongly to delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, fraud or scam concern, and others. These themes are the most useful public proxy for “complaint type” in this corpus because the raw decisions are not stored with a dedicated complaint-type field.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
Mr H and Miss H complain that Allianz Insurance Plc (Allianz) settled a claim, against their policy, as a fault one when they believe it should have been defended and the third party held at fault.backgroundMr H was involved in an accident on 3 September 2017. He was ... (2 pages)
View source decisionMrs L complains that Nationwide Building Society blocked her account for more than a year and didn’t allow her access to the money in the account. She says Nationwide took too long to return her money, didn’t keep her updated and didn’t let her know what information ... (4 pages)
View source decisionMr T’s complaint is about a withdrawal, by Barclays Bank Plc, of a waiver it previously applied to the quarterly administration fee in his account. He says the withdrawal has not been done with proper notice, that the waiver should be reinstated until such notice i... (2 pages)
View source decisionMiss R says Bank of Scotland Plc, trading as Halifax, mis-sold her a payment protection insurance (PPI) policy.backgroundMiss R applied for a credit card in a branch meeting in 2001. The PPI was added to the credit card at the same time and covered her repayments if s... (2 pages)
View source decisionMr M is unhappy that British Gas Insurance Limited (“British Gas”) is applying a cap on whatit will pay out under his home emergency policy.background Mr M has a HomeCare policy with British Gas which includes cover for the boiler and centralheating at his tenante... (4 pages)
View source decision