Published decisions
27,932
2017 decision volume in the public corpus
Year analysis
Detailed public analysis of the 2017 published Financial Ombudsman decision set, including complaint volume, outcome mix, product concentration, firm exposure, and recurring complaint themes.
Page summary
27,932 published FOS decisions in 2017, including upheld-rate context, top firms, top products, recurring complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
27,932
2017 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
27.6%
7,718 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 28 Dec 2017
Published decisions
27,932
2017 decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
27.6%
7,718 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and credit
42.4% of annual decisions
Leading firm
Bank of Scotland Plc
2,601 published decisions
27,932 published ombudsman decisions landed in 2017. 27.6% of those decisions were upheld, while 72.4% were not upheld. That makes 2017 a meaningful benchmark year for understanding where complaint pressure and adjudication risk sat across the corpus.
Banking and credit was the heaviest product area, accounting for 11,853 decisions. Bank of Scotland Plc appeared most often at firm level. The most frequently tagged complaint theme was delay in claim handling.
The year was led by Banking and credit, Payment protection insurance (PPI), Insurance (excluding PPI), and others, which together represented the centre of complaint activity in the published decisions for 2017.
Banking and credit alone contributed 42.4% of all decisions published in 2017, which makes it the clearest lens for understanding how complaint pressure expressed itself that year.
Bank of Scotland Plc, Lloyds Bank PLC, Barclays Bank Plc, and others were the most visible firms in the published decisions for 2017. That does not prove complaint prevalence in a consumer-market sense, but it does show which firms were most exposed in the final ombudsman decisions dataset.
Complaint-theme tagging pointed most strongly to delay in claim handling, affordability assessment failure, fraud or scam concern, and others. These themes are the most useful public proxy for “complaint type” in this corpus because the raw decisions are not stored with a dedicated complaint-type field.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
Mr S complains that HSBC Bank plc (“HSBC”) mis-sold him a mortgage payment protection insurance (“PPI”) policy.backgroundMr S told us that he was very unhappy that PPI was added to his mortgage without his knowledge or consent. He said, if he’d known the policy was offe... (2 pages)
View source decisionThis complaint is about a credit card payment protection insurance (PPI) policy taken out in 2008. Mr W says National Westminster Bank Plc mis-sold him the PPI.my findingsI’ve considered all the available evidence and arguments to decide what is fair and reasonable ... (2 pages)
View source decisionMiss B complains about the valuation esure Insurance Limited placed on her car under her motor insurance policy. She wants it to increase its settlement offer.backgroundMiss B’s car was damaged in a road traffic accident and esure deemed it to be beyond economical r... (2 pages)
View source decisionMr A is unhappy that The Prudential Assurance Company Limited (Prudential) transferred two of his pensions to a Cash Fund when neither his independent financial advisor (IFA) nor Mr A asked them to. He’d like Prudential to make up any potential losses incurred while... (3 pages)
View source decisionMr C complains a roadside recovery agent appointed by The National Farmers’ Union Mutual Insurance Society Limited (NFU Mutual) incorrectly told him that his car battery needed to be replaced.backgroundMr C had a motor insurance policy with NFU Mutual which included road... (2 pages)
View source decision