Year + product analysis

Insurance (excluding PPI) complaints in 2020

A curated public analysis of Insurance (excluding PPI) in 2020, combining annual and product-level signals from the published Financial Ombudsman decision corpus.

Page summary

3,174 published FOS decisions in Insurance (excluding PPI) during 2020, with upheld-rate context, firm concentration, complaint themes, and representative cases.

Published decisions

3,174

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

41.8%

1,326 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 24 Dec 2020

Published decisions

3,174

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

41.8%

1,326 upheld decisions

Leading firm

Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc

248 decisions

Leading complaint theme

Delay In Claim Handling

776 tagged decisions

Insurance (excluding PPI) in 2020

3,174 published decisions in the corpus sit in Insurance (excluding PPI) for 2020. 41.8% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a strong public cross-section for understanding how one product behaved in one specific year.

Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc is the most visible firm inside this year-product slice, with 248 published decisions.

  • 2020: 3,174 decisions, 41.8% upheld
  • Leading complaint theme: Delay In Claim Handling
  • Leading precedent signal: Icobs

Firm concentration and issue profile

Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc, UK Insurance Limited, Aviva Insurance Limited, and others are the firms most often associated with Insurance (excluding PPI) complaints in 2020. This gives a much tighter public view than the standalone year or product pages alone.

delay in claim handling, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, policy wording ambiguity, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in this year-product combination.

  • Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc: 248 decisions, 50.4% upheld
  • UK Insurance Limited: 240 decisions, 41.7% upheld
  • Aviva Insurance Limited: 173 decisions, 38.7% upheld
  • AXA Insurance UK Plc: 136 decisions, 38.2% upheld
  • Admiral Insurance Company Limited: 111 decisions, 42.3% upheld

Handling implications and precedent context

The advisory layer for Insurance (excluding PPI) points to recurring handling implications here, including review disp precedent (appears in 0.5% of cases), review icobs precedent (appears in 0.5% of cases), review insurance act 2015 precedent (appears in 0.2% of cases), and others.

There is no strong “what loses” signal exposed for this product at the current advisory granularity.

  • Leading complaint theme: Delay In Claim Handling

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN863281824 Dec 2020Upheld

British Gas Insurance Limited · Insurance (excluding PPI)

Mrs B’s complaint is about the handling of a claim under her drainage and plumbing insurance policy with British Gas Insurance Limited. background In January 2019, Mrs B made a claim under her policy with British Gas as her bath waste was blocked and it was draining slowly. British Gas sen... (4 pages)

View source decision
DRN201175923 Dec 2020Upheld

AXA Insurance UK Plc · Insurance (excluding PPI)

Complaint Mr and Mrs M are unhappy AXA Insurance UK Plc (AXA) has declined to pay for some work carried out to their property following a flood. They feel this work should be covered under their home insurance policy. Background In December 2013 Mr and Mrs M’s property was flooded, followi... (13 pages)

View source decision
DRN274260923 Dec 2020Upheld

CIP Insurance Brokers Ltd · Insurance (excluding PPI)

Mr S has complained about CIP Insurance Brokers Ltd. He isn’t happy about the fact that it didn’t set up a commercial agricultural policy for him that covered his hired equipment. background Mr S had an agricultural commercial policy which he organised through CIP over a number of years. H... (3 pages)

View source decision
DRN330991123 Dec 2020Upheld

National House-Building Council · Insurance (excluding PPI)

Mr and Mrs S are unhappy with the way National House Building Council (NHBC) have handled a claim under their NHBC Buildmark policies. background Mr S tells us that he made a claim under his NHBC Buildmark policy as the roof to his house was defective. The claim was accepted, and works wer... (3 pages)

View source decision
DRN387042523 Dec 2020Upheld

Red Sands Insurance Company (Europe) Limited · Insurance (excluding PPI)

Complaint Mr H has complained that Red Sands Insurance Company (Europe) Limited unfairly increased the cost of his pet insurance policy. He’s also unhappy with an exclusion that’s been placed on a new policy he purchased and the way a condition has been categorised. My findings I’ve consid... (3 pages)

View source decision