Published decisions
1,965
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Admiral Insurance Company Limited, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,965
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
38.6%
758 upheld decisions
Page summary
1,965 published decisions involving Admiral Insurance Company Limited, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,965
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
38.6%
758 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 11 Aug 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
1,965
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
38.6%
758 upheld decisions
Leading product
Insurance (excluding PPI)
1,351 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
251 tagged decisions
Admiral Insurance Company Limited appears in 1,965 published decisions in this corpus. 38.6% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Insurance (excluding PPI) is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 1,351 decisions and an upheld rate of 39.1%.
Admiral Insurance Company Limited's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, Admiral Insurance Company Limited appeared in 2 published decisions with an upheld rate of 50.0%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Admiral Insurance Company Limited in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Disp, Icobs, Fsma, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
For the reasons given above I don’t uphold Mr A’s complaint. So I won’t be asking Admiral Insurance Company Limited to do anything.
View source decisionFor the reasons I have set out above, my final decision is that I uphold this complaint. I direct Admiral Insurance Company Limited to: • Reimburse the court fine and costs of £1,574 Mr A was required to pay, plus 8% simple interest, from the date Mr A paid them until the date he is reimbursed.
View source decisionDRN-5543242 The complaint Mr C’s complaint is about trade public liability insurance cover with Admiral Insurance Company Limited. Mr C is represented in this complaint but for ease, in the main, I will refer to Mr C only. What happened Mr C took out the policy with Admiral in September... (7 pages)
View source decisionDRN-5386996 The complaint Mr E complains about how Admiral Insurance Company Limited (“Admiral”) removed a discount from his car insurance policy which used a telematics device to gather data about his driving. What happened Mr E had a car insurance policy with Admiral. The policy requi... (3 pages)
View source decisionDRN-5190046 The complaint Ms M complains about the settlement that Admiral Insurance Company Limited offered her for the theft of her car following a claim made on her motor insurance policy, and about the upset this caused her. She wants a higher settlement and for the policy excess to... (3 pages)
View source decision