Published decisions
1,031
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving ReAssure Limited, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,031
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
35.6%
367 upheld decisions
Page summary
1,031 published decisions involving ReAssure Limited, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,031
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
35.6%
367 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 17 Apr 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
1,031
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
35.6%
367 upheld decisions
Leading product
Pensions and Annuities
382 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
170 tagged decisions
ReAssure Limited appears in 1,031 published decisions in this corpus. 35.6% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Pensions and Annuities is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 382 decisions and an upheld rate of 48.7%.
ReAssure Limited's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, ReAssure Limited appeared in 4 published decisions with an upheld rate of 25.0%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to ReAssure Limited in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Cobs, Fsma, Disp, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is I uphold Mr S’ estate’s complaint about ReAssure Limited insofar as I find it has at times provided poor service to the estate. However I make no award for compensation, as I’m not persuaded the estate’s experienced any measurable impact as a result of that poor service.
View source decisionFor the reasons set out above, I’m not upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr K to accept or reject my decision before 14 May 2026.
View source decisionFor the above reasons, my final decision is that I uphold Mr M’s complaint in part. ReAssure Limited has already paid Mr M £500.
View source decisionFor the reasons explained, I uphold this complaint. I direct ReAssure Limited to pay Mr B £500.
View source decisionDRN-5310786 The complaint Mr V is unhappy with the administration of his Reviewable Whole of Life (RWOL) policy. What happened Mr V was advised to take out a RWOL policy – the Barclays Lifestages policy, with Barclays when he was arranging a mortgage. The policy commenced on 14 January... (9 pages)
View source decision