Year + product analysis

Consumer Credit complaints in 2026

A curated public analysis of Consumer Credit in 2026, combining annual and product-level signals from the published Financial Ombudsman decision corpus.

Published decisions

1,364

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

18.6%

254 upheld decisions

Page summary

1,364 published FOS decisions in Consumer Credit during 2026, with upheld-rate context, firm concentration, complaint themes, and representative cases.

Published decisions

1,364

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

18.6%

254 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 07 Jul 2026

How to use this page

Read the metrics first, then the ranked view.

The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.

Published decisions

1,364

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

18.6%

254 upheld decisions

Leading firm

Shawbrook Bank Limited

190 decisions

Leading complaint theme

Affordability Assessment Failure

747 tagged decisions

Consumer Credit in 2026

Analysis

1,364 published decisions in the corpus sit in Consumer Credit for 2026. 18.6% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a strong public cross-section for understanding how one product behaved in one specific year.

Shawbrook Bank Limited is the most visible firm inside this year-product slice, with 190 published decisions.

  • 2026: 1,364 decisions, 18.6% upheld
  • Leading complaint theme: Affordability Assessment Failure
  • Leading precedent signal: Consumer Credit Act 1974

Firm concentration and issue profile

Analysis

Shawbrook Bank Limited, Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc, Clydesdale Financial Services Limited, and others are the firms most often associated with Consumer Credit complaints in 2026. This gives a much tighter public view than the standalone year or product pages alone.

affordability assessment failure, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, delay in claim handling, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in this year-product combination.

  • Shawbrook Bank Limited: 190 decisions, 5.3% upheld
  • Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc: 139 decisions, 7.9% upheld
  • Clydesdale Financial Services Limited: 86 decisions, 3.5% upheld
  • MONEYBARN NO.1 LIMITED: 74 decisions, 4.0% upheld
  • BMW Financial Services (GB) Limited: 38 decisions, 47.4% upheld

Handling implications and precedent context

Analysis

The advisory layer for Consumer Credit points to recurring handling implications here, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 12.9% of cases), review section 75 cca precedent (appears in 8.6% of cases), review section 140a cca precedent (appears in 5.1% of cases), and others.

There is no strong “what loses” signal exposed for this product at the current advisory granularity.

  • Leading complaint theme: Affordability Assessment Failure

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-614702107 Jul 2026Upheld

I C LOANS LIMITED · Consumer Credit

It’s my final decision that I uphold this complaint against I C LOANS LIMITED. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr W to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision
DRN-616202207 Jul 2026Not upheld

Mercedes-Benz Financial Services UK Limited · Consumer Credit

My final decision is I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Ms C to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision
DRN-625428607 Jul 2026Upheld

Tandem Motor Finance Limited · Consumer Credit

My final decision is that I uphold this complaint and Tandem Motor Finance Limited must put things right as set out above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr G to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision
DRN-627285707 Jul 2026Not upheld

Oodle Financial Services Limited · Consumer Credit

My final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr P to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision
DRN-627392807 Jul 2026Not upheld

Creation Consumer Finance Limited · Consumer Credit

For the reasons given above, I don’t uphold the complaint or make any award against Creation Consumer Finance Limited. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr L to accept or reject my decision before 4 August 2026.

View source decision