Year + product analysis

Consumer Credit complaints in 2026

A curated public analysis of Consumer Credit in 2026, combining annual and product-level signals from the published Financial Ombudsman decision corpus.

Published decisions

1,157

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

17.0%

197 upheld decisions

Page summary

1,157 published FOS decisions in Consumer Credit during 2026, with upheld-rate context, firm concentration, complaint themes, and representative cases.

Published decisions

1,157

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

17.0%

197 upheld decisions

Latest published decision 21 Apr 2026

How to use this page

Read the metrics first, then the ranked view.

The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.

Published decisions

1,157

Decision volume in this year-product slice

Upheld rate

17.0%

197 upheld decisions

Leading firm

Shawbrook Bank Limited

181 decisions

Leading complaint theme

Affordability Assessment Failure

685 tagged decisions

Consumer Credit in 2026

Analysis

1,157 published decisions in the corpus sit in Consumer Credit for 2026. 17.0% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a strong public cross-section for understanding how one product behaved in one specific year.

Shawbrook Bank Limited is the most visible firm inside this year-product slice, with 181 published decisions.

  • 2026: 1,157 decisions, 17.0% upheld
  • Leading complaint theme: Affordability Assessment Failure
  • Leading precedent signal: Consumer Credit Act 1974

Firm concentration and issue profile

Analysis

Shawbrook Bank Limited, Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc, Clydesdale Financial Services Limited, and others are the firms most often associated with Consumer Credit complaints in 2026. This gives a much tighter public view than the standalone year or product pages alone.

affordability assessment failure, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, delay in claim handling, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in this year-product combination.

  • Shawbrook Bank Limited: 181 decisions, 5.0% upheld
  • Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc: 112 decisions, 4.5% upheld
  • Clydesdale Financial Services Limited: 81 decisions, 2.5% upheld
  • MONEYBARN NO.1 LIMITED: 62 decisions, 1.6% upheld
  • BMW Financial Services (GB) Limited: 25 decisions, 44.0% upheld

Handling implications and precedent context

Analysis

The advisory layer for Consumer Credit points to recurring handling implications here, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 12.9% of cases), review section 75 cca precedent (appears in 8.6% of cases), review section 140a cca precedent (appears in 5.1% of cases), and others.

There is no strong “what loses” signal exposed for this product at the current advisory granularity.

  • Leading complaint theme: Affordability Assessment Failure

Representative cases

Recent published decisions in this slice

5 examples shown

DRN-476287721 Apr 2026Not upheld

Mitsubishi HC Capital UK Plc · Consumer Credit

My decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-480026321 Apr 2026Not upheld

Shawbrook Bank Limited · Consumer Credit

I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs C and Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-604067121 Apr 2026Not upheld

Shawbrook Bank Limited · Consumer Credit

For the reasons given, I don’t think it was unfair for Shawbrook Bank Limited to decline Mr and Mrs I’s claims under section 75 of the CCA. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs A and Mr I to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-604147221 Apr 2026Not upheld

Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Limited · Consumer Credit

For the reasons given above, it’s my final decision not to uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision
DRN-604365421 Apr 2026Not upheld

N.I.I.B. Group Limited · Consumer Credit

For the reasons above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss F to accept or reject my decision before 19 May 2026.

View source decision