Published decisions
2,468
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving NewDay Ltd, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Page summary
2,468 published decisions involving NewDay Ltd, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
2,468
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
47.7%
1,178 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 02 Feb 2026
Published decisions
2,468
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
47.7%
1,178 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and Payments
1,700 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
250 tagged decisions
NewDay Ltd appears in 2,468 published decisions in this corpus. 47.7% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Banking and Payments is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 1,700 decisions and an upheld rate of 48.2%.
NewDay Ltd's decision trail runs from 2014 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, NewDay Ltd appeared in 6 published decisions with an upheld rate of 16.7%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to NewDay Ltd in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Consumer Credit Act 1974, Section 75 Cca, Section 140a Cca, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is that I don’t uphold the complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs K to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I don’t uphold the complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr L to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionI don’t uphold Mr A’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr A to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I’m upholding this complaint and NewDay Ltd trading as Aqua must put things right as I’ve set out above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss L to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I don’t uphold Ms M’s complaint about NewDay Ltd. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Ms M to accept or reject my decision before 27 February 2026.
View source decision