Published decisions
1,363
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Vanquis Bank Limited, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,363
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
23.8%
324 upheld decisions
Page summary
1,363 published decisions involving Vanquis Bank Limited, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,363
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
23.8%
324 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 17 Mar 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
1,363
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
23.8%
324 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and Payments
769 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Affordability Assessment Failure
146 tagged decisions
Vanquis Bank Limited appears in 1,363 published decisions in this corpus. 23.8% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Banking and Payments is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 769 decisions and an upheld rate of 22.5%.
Vanquis Bank Limited's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, Vanquis Bank Limited appeared in 19 published decisions with an upheld rate of 31.6%.
Affordability Assessment Failure is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Vanquis Bank Limited in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Consumer Credit Act 1974, Section 75 Cca, Section 140a Cca, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
My final decision is that I’m not upholding Mr G’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr G to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionI do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss W to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I’m not upholding Mr Y’s complaint about Vanquis Bank Limited. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr Y to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionIt’s my final decision that I do not uphold this complaint against Vanquis. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr O to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold this complaint and direct Vanquis to put things right, in the way I’ve set out above. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr G to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decision