Published decisions
325
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
BISL Limited complaint analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving BISL Limited, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Upheld rate
21.9%
71 upheld decisions
Page summary
325 published decisions involving BISL Limited, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
325
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
21.9%
71 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 21 Aug 2026
How to use this page
Read the metrics first, then the ranked view.
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
325
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
21.9%
71 upheld decisions
Leading product
Insurance (excluding PPI)
191 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
21 tagged decisions
BISL Limited at a glance
AnalysisBISL Limited appears in 325 published decisions in this corpus. 21.9% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Insurance (excluding PPI) is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 191 decisions and an upheld rate of 20.9%.
- Latest active year in the published data: 2026 (4 decisions)
- Most common complaint theme: Delay In Claim Handling
- Most common precedent signal: Disp
Volume and outcome trajectory
AnalysisBISL Limited's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, BISL Limited appeared in 4 published decisions with an upheld rate of 0.0%.
- 2026: 4 decisions, 0.0% upheld
- 2025: 27 decisions, 29.6% upheld
- 2024: 23 decisions, 43.5% upheld
- 2023: 20 decisions, 40.0% upheld
- 2022: 13 decisions, 7.7% upheld
Themes, products, and precedent signals
AnalysisDelay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to BISL Limited in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Disp, Icobs are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
- Insurance (excluding PPI): 191 decisions
- Second complaint theme: Administrative Error
- Second precedent signal: Icobs
Representative cases
Recent published decisions in this slice
5 examples shown
DRN-627397721 Aug 2026Not upheld
BISL Limited · Insurance
For the reasons I stated above, I am not upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr C to accept or reject my decision before 18 September 2026.
View source decisionDRN-639889927 Jul 2026Not upheld
BISL Limited · Insurance
For the reasons I’ve set out above, it’s my final decision that I don’t uphold his complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr P to accept or reject my decision before 24 August 2026.
View source decisionDRN-629784807 Jul 2026Not upheld
BISL Limited · Insurance
My final decision is that I uphold this complaint, and direct BISL Limited (if it hasn’t already) to carry out the compensation awards it made in response to this complaint. Those being: • pay Miss S £75 compensation in recognition of the distress and inconvenience caused • pay Miss S £3.
View source decisionDRN-594207617 Feb 2026Not upheld
BISL Limited · Insurance
For the reasons I’ve explained, my final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. I don’t direct BISL Limited o do any more in response to this complaint.
View source decisionDRN-588585022 Dec 2025Not upheld
BISL Limited · Insurance
DRN-5885850 The complaint Mrs S complains that BISL Limited cancelled her motor insurance policy. She wants compensation for the inconvenience this has caused. What happened Mrs S’s policy was renewed through BISL, her broker/policy administrator, with no claims having been made within... (2 pages)
View source decision