Published decisions
1,583
Decision volume in this year-product slice
Year + product analysis
A curated public analysis of Pensions and Annuities in 2024, combining annual and product-level signals from the published Financial Ombudsman decision corpus.
Page summary
1,583 published FOS decisions in Pensions and Annuities during 2024, with upheld-rate context, firm concentration, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,583
Decision volume in this year-product slice
Upheld rate
54.4%
861 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 31 Dec 2024
Published decisions
1,583
Decision volume in this year-product slice
Upheld rate
54.4%
861 upheld decisions
Leading firm
Options UK Personal Pensions LLP
129 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
179 tagged decisions
1,583 published decisions in the corpus sit in Pensions and Annuities for 2024. 54.4% of those decisions were upheld, which makes this a strong public cross-section for understanding how one product behaved in one specific year.
Options UK Personal Pensions LLP is the most visible firm inside this year-product slice, with 129 published decisions.
Options UK Personal Pensions LLP, Scottish Widows Limited, Aviva Life & Pensions UK Limited, and others are the firms most often associated with Pensions and Annuities complaints in 2024. This gives a much tighter public view than the standalone year or product pages alone.
delay in claim handling, fraud or scam concern, non-disclosure or misrepresentation, and others are the strongest complaint-theme signals in this year-product combination.
The advisory layer for Pensions and Annuities points to recurring handling implications here, including review cobs precedent (appears in 0.9% of cases), review fsma precedent (appears in 0.8% of cases), review prin precedent (appears in 0.7% of cases), and others.
There is no strong “what loses” signal exposed for this product at the current advisory granularity.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
DRN-4580461 The complaint Mr H complains that he relied upon information by to him by Scottish Widows Limited (Scottish Widows) which it knew to be incorrect, and he suffered losses as a result. What happened The history leading up to this complaint is well known to the parties and has ... (3 pages)
View source decisionDRN-4986233 The complaint Mr C is unhappy that Embark Investment Services Limited trading as Stocktrade (Stocktrade) didn’t pay interest on his cash account within his pension plan. What happened The history leading up to this complaint is well known to the parties and will not be repe... (3 pages)
View source decisionDRN-5053173 The complaint Mr T complained that Scottish Widows Limited (Scottish Widows) made mistakes which meant contributions were missing from his personal pension, reducing the value of his benefits. Scottish Widows has confirmed to Mr T that this error has been rectified and that ... (3 pages)
View source decisionDRN-5161658 The complaint Mr J’s complaint is about the discretionary management of his pension portfolio by LGT Wealth Management UK LLP (‘LGT’), including the predecessor firms, which LGT acquired, that previously managed the portfolio. His Financial Adviser (‘FA’) had an advisory rol... (10 pages)
View source decisionDRN-5175173 The complaint Mrs M complains that Gemini Wealth Management Limited delayed the transfer of three pensions into her retirement account and the payment of the tax free lump sums she was entitled to. She’s suffered financial loss, distress and inconvenience as a result. What ... (13 pages)
View source decision