Published decisions
407
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Zopa Bank Limited, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Page summary
407 published decisions involving Zopa Bank Limited, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
407
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
37.8%
154 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 02 Feb 2026
Published decisions
407
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
37.8%
154 upheld decisions
Leading product
Consumer Credit
280 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Affordability Assessment Failure
68 tagged decisions
Zopa Bank Limited appears in 407 published decisions in this corpus. 37.8% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Consumer Credit is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 280 decisions and an upheld rate of 43.2%.
Zopa Bank Limited's decision trail runs from 2020 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, Zopa Bank Limited appeared in 3 published decisions with an upheld rate of 0.0%.
Affordability Assessment Failure is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Zopa Bank Limited in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Consumer Credit Act 1974, Section 140a Cca, Section 75 Cca are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
For the reasons I’ve explained, I’m not upholding Miss W’s complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss W to accept or reject my decision before 2 March 2026.
View source decisionAs outlined above, my final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint against Zopa Bank Limited. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr E to accept or reject my decision before 27 February 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr C to accept or reject my decision before 27 February 2026.
View source decisionDRN-5938171 The complaint Mr H complains about the quality of a vehicle that was supplied through a hire purchase agreement with Zopa Bank Limited (Zopa). What happened In April 2024, Mr H acquired a used car through a hire purchase agreement with Zopa. The car was about eight years old... (4 pages)
View source decisionDRN-6033459 The complaint Mr B complains about the quality of a car he acquired under a hire purchase agreement with ZOPA BANK LIMITED (Zopa). When I refer to what Mr B and Zopa said or did, it should also be taken to include things said or done on their behalf. What happened In Octob... (5 pages)
View source decision