Published decisions
446
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving RCI Financial Services Limited, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
446
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
44.0%
196 upheld decisions
Page summary
446 published decisions involving RCI Financial Services Limited, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
446
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
44.0%
196 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 11 Aug 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
446
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
44.0%
196 upheld decisions
Leading product
Banking and credit
230 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
32 tagged decisions
RCI Financial Services Limited appears in 446 published decisions in this corpus. 44.0% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Banking and credit is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 230 decisions and an upheld rate of 42.6%.
RCI Financial Services Limited's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, RCI Financial Services Limited appeared in 9 published decisions with an upheld rate of 22.2%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to RCI Financial Services Limited in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Consumer Credit Act 1974, Conc, Section 140a Cca, and others are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
For the reasons I’ve given above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr P to accept or reject my decision before 8 September 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve given above, I uphold this complaint in part and tell RCI Financial Services Limited to remove the November 2025 late payment marker and any other adverse credit information arising from the October and November 2025 payments it has refunded. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs C to accept or reject my decision before 7 September 2026.
View source decisionAs I’ve explained above, I’m not upholding Miss J’s complaint about RCI Financial Services Limited trading as Mobilize Financial Services. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss J to accept or reject my decision before 24 August 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons explained, I don’t uphold Mrs B’s complaint about RCI Financial Services Limited trading as Nissan Financial Services. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs B to accept or reject my decision before 17 August 2026.
View source decisionI am upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 27 July 2026.
View source decision