Published decisions
1,237
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Covea Insurance plc, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,237
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
41.1%
508 upheld decisions
Page summary
1,237 published decisions involving Covea Insurance plc, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,237
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
41.1%
508 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 04 Aug 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
1,237
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
41.1%
508 upheld decisions
Leading product
Insurance
765 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
120 tagged decisions
Covea Insurance plc appears in 1,237 published decisions in this corpus. 41.1% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Insurance is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 765 decisions and an upheld rate of 42.9%.
Covea Insurance plc's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, Covea Insurance plc appeared in 7 published decisions with an upheld rate of 42.9%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Covea Insurance plc in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Icobs, Disp, Consumer Credit Act 1974 are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
So for these reasons it’s my final decision that I uphold this complaint only for the compensation Covea has already paid to Mr B. Otherwise I don’t uphold Mr B’s complaint.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I do not uphold Miss P’s complaint against Covea Insurance plc. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss P to accept or reject my decision before 31 July 2026.
View source decisionI uphold this complaint. I require Covea Insurance plc to provide the redress set out above at “Putting things right”.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss H to accept or reject my decision before 3 April 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold this complaint. Covea Insurance plc should put things right as set out above.
View source decision