Published decisions
871
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving Zurich Insurance PLC, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
871
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.2%
263 upheld decisions
Page summary
871 published decisions involving Zurich Insurance PLC, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
871
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.2%
263 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 16 Feb 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
871
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
30.2%
263 upheld decisions
Leading product
Insurance (excluding PPI)
474 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
143 tagged decisions
Zurich Insurance PLC appears in 871 published decisions in this corpus. 30.2% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Insurance (excluding PPI) is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 474 decisions and an upheld rate of 25.7%.
Zurich Insurance PLC's decision trail runs from 2013 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, Zurich Insurance PLC appeared in 4 published decisions with an upheld rate of 25.0%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to Zurich Insurance PLC in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Disp, Icobs, Insurance Act 2015 are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
I’ve decided not to uphold Mr C’s complaint about Zurich Insurance PLC. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr C to accept or reject my decision before 16 March 2026.
View source decisionI don’t uphold the complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Ms E to accept or reject my decision before 9 March 2026.
View source decisionIt’s my final decision that I uphold this complaint in part and direct Zurich Insurance PLC to: • Reconsider the claim for valuables, in line with the remaining terms, without applying the single item limit • Pay Mr G a total of £500 compensation (including the £300 already offered) Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr G to accept or reject my decision before 27 February 2026....
View source decisionZurich Insurance PLC has already made an offer to settle the complaint, and I think this offer is fair in all the circumstances. So my decision is that Zurich Insurance PLC should pay Mr W the £500 compensation offered in its final response letter of 22 August 2025.
View source decisionDRN-5760471 The complaint Mr B and Mrs B have complained about the repairs carried out by Zurich Insurance PLC (Zurich) under their home insurance policy. What happened Mr B and Mrs B made a claim under their policy. Zurich carried out repairs, including to the roof. A while later, the... (3 pages)
View source decision