Published decisions
1,800
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Firm + product analysis
A curated public analysis of AXA Insurance UK Plc's published Financial Ombudsman decisions in Insurance, including outcome context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,800
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
41.6%
748 upheld decisions
Page summary
1,800 published FOS decisions involving AXA Insurance UK Plc in Insurance, with upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,800
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
41.6%
748 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 17 Mar 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
1,800
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
41.6%
748 upheld decisions
Latest active year
2026
19 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
77 tagged decisions
AXA Insurance UK Plc appears in 1,800 published decisions in Insurance across this corpus. 41.6% of those decisions were upheld, making this one of the strongest public firm-product slices available for search and research.
The latest year represented in this slice is 2026, with 19 published decisions and an upheld rate of 36.8%.
AXA Insurance UK Plc has a multi-year published decision trail in Insurance, which makes it possible to judge whether complaint exposure has been persistent or concentrated into a smaller set of years.
Insurance remains a meaningful part of AXA Insurance UK Plc's published complaint exposure, but this page isolates just that one product line instead of blending it with the firm's wider footprint.
Delay In Claim Handling is the clearest complaint-theme signal in this firm-product slice, which helps explain what tends to drive published ombudsman decisions here.
The product advisory layer also points to recurring handling implications, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 1.3% of cases), review section 140a cca precedent (appears in 1.1% of cases), review disp precedent (appears in 0.3% of cases), and others.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
For the reasons I have given, it is my final decision that the complaint is not upheld. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mrs C and Mr C to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I do not uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr J to accept or reject my decision before 14 April 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons given, my final decision is that I uphold this complaint. I direct AXA Insurance UK Plc to conclude the complaint in the way I have set out in the “Putting things right” section above.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold this complaint. AXA Insurance UK Plc is directed to follow my directions for putting things right as set out above.
View source decisionFor the reasons set out above, I uphold Mr S’s complaint in part. AXA Insurance UK Plc must pay Mr S £600 in total in compensation for his trouble and upset.
View source decision