Published decisions
1,832
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Firm + product analysis
A curated public analysis of AXA Insurance UK Plc's published Financial Ombudsman decisions in Insurance, including outcome context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,832
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
41.3%
757 upheld decisions
Page summary
1,832 published FOS decisions involving AXA Insurance UK Plc in Insurance, with upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,832
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
41.3%
757 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 21 Aug 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
1,832
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
41.3%
757 upheld decisions
Latest active year
2026
51 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
87 tagged decisions
AXA Insurance UK Plc appears in 1,832 published decisions in Insurance across this corpus. 41.3% of those decisions were upheld, making this one of the strongest public firm-product slices available for search and research.
The latest year represented in this slice is 2026, with 51 published decisions and an upheld rate of 31.4%.
AXA Insurance UK Plc has a multi-year published decision trail in Insurance, which makes it possible to judge whether complaint exposure has been persistent or concentrated into a smaller set of years.
Insurance remains a meaningful part of AXA Insurance UK Plc's published complaint exposure, but this page isolates just that one product line instead of blending it with the firm's wider footprint.
Delay In Claim Handling is the clearest complaint-theme signal in this firm-product slice, which helps explain what tends to drive published ombudsman decisions here.
The product advisory layer also points to recurring handling implications, including review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 1.3% of cases), review section 140a cca precedent (appears in 1.1% of cases), review disp precedent (appears in 0.3% of cases), and others.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
For the reasons I stated above, my final decision is that I am not upholding this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr C to accept or reject my decision before 18 September 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons given above, I partially uphold Mr S’s complaint about AXA Insurance UK Plc. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 15 September 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr C to accept or reject my decision before 31 August 2026.
View source decisionI don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr D and Ms T to accept or reject my decision before 28 August 2026.
View source decisionFor the reasons I’ve given, I don’t uphold Mr W’s complaint about AXA Insurance UK Plc. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr W to accept or reject my decision before 27 August 2026.
View source decision