Published decisions
385
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Firm analysis
A public analysis page covering published Financial Ombudsman decisions involving One Insurance Limited, including outcome context, product mix, complaint themes, and representative cases.
Published decisions
385
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
66.8%
257 upheld decisions
Page summary
385 published decisions involving One Insurance Limited, with product mix, upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
385
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
66.8%
257 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 06 Mar 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
385
Firm-specific decision volume in the public corpus
Upheld rate
66.8%
257 upheld decisions
Leading product
Insurance
255 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
49 tagged decisions
One Insurance Limited appears in 385 published decisions in this corpus. 66.8% of those decisions were upheld, which gives a public view of how often complaints involving this firm ended in a fully upheld outcome in the final published set.
Insurance is the firm’s clearest product exposure in the published decisions, with 255 decisions and an upheld rate of 69.0%.
One Insurance Limited's decision trail runs from 2014 to 2026. That range gives enough public history to see whether complaint exposure has been broad-based or concentrated into certain years.
In the latest year represented here, One Insurance Limited appeared in 3 published decisions with an upheld rate of 66.7%.
Delay In Claim Handling is the strongest complaint-theme signal tied to One Insurance Limited in the published decisions. In this corpus, those themes are the most stable public proxy for complaint “type”.
Icobs are the most visible precedent signals in the firm’s published decisions. That gives extra context on the rules and fairness arguments appearing most often around the firm.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
It’s my final decision that I uphold this complaint. I direct One Insurance Limited to reconsider Mr O’s claim on the remaining policy terms.
View source decisionMy final decision is that I uphold this complaint. I require One Insurance Limited to do the following: • Recalculate the total loss settlement it paid Miss F by removing a reduction for the address change.
View source decisionFor the reasons above, I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr M to accept or reject my decision before 27 February 2026.
View source decisionDRN-6037267 The complaint Mr S complains that One Insurance Limited has unfairly declined a claim under his legal expenses insurance policy. Where I refer to One Insurance, this includes the actions of its agents and claims handlers for which it takes responsibility. What happened The... (5 pages)
View source decisionDRN-5937020 The complaint Mr G complains about how his insurer, One Insurance Limited (One) valued his vehicle as a total loss following an accident. He’s also unhappy at having to pay £150 to have his vehicle returned and being charged an excess of £300 under the policy. Any reference... (5 pages)
View source decision