Published decisions
1,077
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Firm + product analysis
A curated public analysis of Barclays Bank UK PLC's published Financial Ombudsman decisions in Mortgages, including outcome context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,077
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
42.7%
460 upheld decisions
Page summary
1,077 published FOS decisions involving Barclays Bank UK PLC in Mortgages, with upheld-rate context, complaint themes, precedent signals, and representative cases.
Published decisions
1,077
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
42.7%
460 upheld decisions
Latest published decision 31 Mar 2026
How to use this page
The top-line cards show scale and outcome context. The ranked view and representative decisions show where the slice is concentrated and what the published decision set actually looks like.
Published decisions
1,077
Decision volume in this firm-product slice
Upheld rate
42.7%
460 upheld decisions
Latest active year
2026
15 decisions
Leading complaint theme
Delay In Claim Handling
111 tagged decisions
Barclays Bank UK PLC appears in 1,077 published decisions in Mortgages across this corpus. 42.7% of those decisions were upheld, making this one of the strongest public firm-product slices available for search and research.
The latest year represented in this slice is 2026, with 15 published decisions and an upheld rate of 53.3%.
Barclays Bank UK PLC has a multi-year published decision trail in Mortgages, which makes it possible to judge whether complaint exposure has been persistent or concentrated into a smaller set of years.
Mortgages remains a meaningful part of Barclays Bank UK PLC's published complaint exposure, but this page isolates just that one product line instead of blending it with the firm's wider footprint.
Delay In Claim Handling is the clearest complaint-theme signal in this firm-product slice, which helps explain what tends to drive published ombudsman decisions here.
The product advisory layer also points to recurring handling implications, including review disp precedent (appears in 0.1% of cases), review consumer credit act 1974 precedent (appears in 0.1% of cases), review fsma precedent (appears in 0.1% of cases), and others.
Representative cases
5 examples shown
I uphold this complaint and direct Barclays to remove litigation costs from proceedings started in February 2025 along with the associated interest from Mr H’s account. Barclays should pay £600 directly to Mr H.
View source decisionI uphold this complaint and direct Barclays Bank UK PLC trading as Woolwich to: • Provide further staff training and add a detailed note to Ms H’s account outlining that there is a credit reserve which withdrawals can be made from, and that overpayments can be made into. • Manually review any payments made into the reserve when the CMP is over £170, to ensure the CMP is recalculated when any overpayments of more ...
View source decisionFor the reasons given in my provisional decision, reproduced above, my final decision is that I don’t uphold this complaint. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Miss K to accept or reject my decision before 28 April 2026.
View source decisionMy final decision is that Barclays Bank UK PLC should: • Refund the ERC of £8,492. 00.
View source decisionI uphold this complaint and order Barclays Bank UK PLC to settle it as I’ve set out above, once Mr S has notified it which rate he has chosen. Under the rules of the Financial Ombudsman Service, I’m required to ask Mr S to accept or reject my decision before 20 April 2026.
View source decision